Abstract
The effects of root spraying FeSO4 on grain sulphur content,iron content,protein content,starch components,SDS-sedimentation value,gluten quality and rheological properties in four spring wheat cultivars were investigated in the greenhouse.The results showed that different FeSO4 spraying amounts had significant influence on grain components and flour quality.The sulphur content,iron content,protein content,SDS-sedimentation value,wet gluten content and gluten index of FeSO4 sprayed sample were significantly higher than S0(0 g/m2),but the dry gluten content has no significant change.The most suitable FeSO4 spraying amount for different cultivars and different quality parameters were different too.The amylose content,amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch content of two cultivars were significantly lower than S0 and the other two cultivars had no significant change.The development time,stability and breakdown time in farinograph for the four cultivars was increased first and then reduced.The FeSO4 spraying amount for the best rheological properties was S2(15 g/m2)or S3(22.5 g/m2).The FeSO4 spraying amount and rheological parameters have no significant correlations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
FeSO4 increased grain sulphur, iron and protein content.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivars
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- FeSO4 sprayede0
- Outcome
- sulphur content,iron content,protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- S0(0 g/m2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The sulphur content,iron content,protein content,SDS-sedimentation value,wet gluten content and gluten index of FeSO4 sprayed sample were significantly higher than S0(0 g/m2)”
Claim · model-written summary
FeSO4 increased SDS sedimentation value, wet gluten content and gluten index.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FeSO4 sprayede0
- Outcome
- SDS-sedimentation value,wet gluten content and gluten indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- S0(0 g/m2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“SDS-sedimentation value,wet gluten content and gluten index of FeSO4 sprayed sample were significantly higher than S0(0 g/m2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry gluten content did not significantly change.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FeSO4 sprayede0
- Outcome
- dry gluten contente0
- Direction
- no significant changee0
- Comparator
- S0(0 g/m2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“FeSO4 sprayed sample were significantly higher than S0(0 g/m2),but the dry gluten content has no significant change.”
Claim · model-written summary
In two cultivars, amylose content, amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch content decreased.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- amylose content,amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch contente0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- two cultivarse0
- Comparator
- S0e0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The amylose content,amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch content of two cultivars were significantly lower than S0”
Claim · model-written summary
The other two cultivars showed no significant change in the listed starch traits.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- amylose content,amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch contente0
- Direction
- no significant changee0
- Qualifier
- other two cultivarse0
- Comparator
- S0e0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The amylose content,amylose/amylopectin ratio and total starch content of two cultivars were significantly lower than S0 and the other two cultivars had no significant change.”
Claim · model-written summary
Farinograph development, stability and breakdown time first increased then decreased.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- development time,stability and breakdown timee0
- Direction
- increased first and then reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The development time,stability and breakdown time in farinograph for the four cultivars was increased first and then reduced.”
Claim · model-written summary
The best rheological properties occurred at S2 or S3 FeSO4 spraying.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- S2(15 g/m2)or S3(22.5 g/m2)e0
- Outcome
- rheological propertiese0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The FeSO4 spraying amount for the best rheological properties was S2(15 g/m2)or S3(22.5 g/m2).”
Claim · model-written summary
FeSO4 amount and rheological parameters showed no significant correlation.
- Taxon
- spring wheat cultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- FeSO4 spraying amounte0
- Outcome
- rheological parameterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat cultivars”
e0“The FeSO4 spraying amount and rheological parameters have no significant correlations.”
The same questions in other papers
iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.