Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of varieties and nutrient management on quality and zinc biofortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

MOHD ARIF; L N DASHORA; J CHOUDHARY; et al.

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2016–17 and 2017–18 at Udaipur (Rajasthan) to study the effect of wheat varieties and nutrient management on zinc biofortification. The treatments consist of four wheat varieties, viz. Raj 4120, Raj 4037, Raj 4079 and Raj 4238 in main plots and seven nutrient management treatments viz. 100% RDN, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray, 100% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray, 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application, 125% RDN + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray and 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray in sub plots. The study of different wheat varieties indicated that highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037 (on pooled basis). Further, application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield; protein content (13.77%), grain appearance score (7.87), hectoliter weight (80.98 kg/hl), sedimentation volume (46.97 CC) and beta carotene content (3.64 ppm); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw (on pooled basis).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest grain yield of 5707 kg/ha.

Material
Raj 4037e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5707 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest straw yield of 8869 kg/ha.

Material
Raj 4037e1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8869 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest protein content of 12.96%.

Material
Raj 4037e1
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste1
Value
12.96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest hectoliter weight of 80.48 kg/ hl.

Material
Raj 4037e1
Outcome
hectoliter weighte0
Direction
higheste1
Value
80.48 kg/ hle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest sedimentation volume of 45.20 CC.

Material
Raj 4037e1
Outcome
sedimentation volumee0
Direction
higheste1
Value
45.20 CCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values of yield viz. grain (5707 kg/ha) and straw (8869 kg/ha) yield; quality parameters viz. protein content (12.96%), hectoliter weight (80.48 kg/ hl) and sedimentation volume (45.20 CC); and nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raj 4037 had the highest nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc content and uptake in grain and straw.

Material
Raj 4037e0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zince0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw was recorded with variety Raj 4037”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% RDN plus soil and foliar ZnSO4 treatment produced significantly higher grain yield of 5681 kg/ha.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
5681 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced significantly higher straw yield of 8265 kg/ha.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
8265 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced significantly higher protein content of 13.77%.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
13.77%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content (13.77%), grain appearance score (7.87), hectoliter weight (80.98 kg/hl), sedimentation volume (46.97 CC) and beta carotene content (3.64 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced a grain appearance score of 7.87.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
grain appearance scoree0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
7.87e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content (13.77%), grain appearance score (7.87), hectoliter weight (80.98 kg/hl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced hectoliter weight of 80.98 kg/hl.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
hectoliter weighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
80.98 kg/hle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hectoliter weight (80.98 kg/hl), sedimentation volume (46.97 CC) and beta carotene content (3.64 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced sedimentation volume of 46.97 CC.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
sedimentation volumee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
46.97 CCe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sedimentation volume (46.97 CC) and beta carotene content (3.64 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced beta carotene content of 3.64 ppm.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
beta carotene contente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
3.64 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“beta carotene content (3.64 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment raised nitrogen, potassium and zinc content and uptake in grain and straw.

Treatment
125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spraye1
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, potassium and zince0
Direction
higherinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient content and uptakes of nitrogen, potassium and zinc in both grain and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of treatment 125% RDN + ZnSO4 25 kg/ha soil application + ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray recorded significantly higher grain (5681 kg/ha) and straw (8265 kg/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.