Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MnSO4 in wheat gave a non-significant increase in wheat yield at Pantnagar

A claim from Performance of wheat in relation to INM under Rice-Wheat cropping system · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MnSO4 in wheat gave a non-significant increase in wheat yield at Pantnagar

Treatment
MnSO4e3
Outcome
wheat yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
all the other treatmentse3
Setting
Pantnagare5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“when FeSO4 was replaced by MnSO4 in wheat, some increase was found in wheat yield; but not statistically significant over all the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–774
e5

“at GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–238

Title

Performance of wheat in relation to INM under Rice-Wheat cropping system

Rajeew Kumar; Vijay Pal Singh; Aniket Kalhapure; et al. Agrica 2015. doi:10.5958/2394-448x.2015.00003.6

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e027e51cf2c08638c8a76478f61a3d64cd58fab49ae69a82da5d77e63e211444 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

manganese(II) sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Increasing MnSO4 concentration increased grain yield.

    Presowing soaking of wheat seeds in copper and manganese solutions · 1982 · compared with increasing concentrations

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.