Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Extension Education

Assessment and Analysis of Agriculture Technology Adoption and Yield Gaps in Wheat Production in Sub-Tropical Punjab

Gurdeep Singh; Pritpal Singh; G. P. S. Sodhi

14
claims
16
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yield gap analysis evaluates magnitude and variability of difference between crop yield potential and yield obtained at farmers ’fields. The magnitude of yield gap and related causes vary substantially, and depends upon technology gap generated by partial or incomplete adoption of locally optimized technology. Periodic survey (2013–16) revealed that ∼622 per cent of wheat area in Mansa (Punjab)during 2012–16 was under un-recommended varieties. More than 1/3rd (∼35%) of farmers were using un-treated wheat seed and therefore, experienced infestation of seed borne diseases at their fields. About 28 per cent farmers were using higher seed rate than recommended (100 kg seed ha−1), constitutes majority of those farmers who had retained seed from previous year harvest. Only 1/10th of farmers apply fertilizer N to wheat at recommended rate (125 kg N ha−1). About 81 per cent farmers did not apply basal N dose, therefore, appearance of N deficiency on lower wheat leaves occur commonly, resulting in a significant set-back on crop grain yield. Data revealed that 91, 79 and 67 per cent of farmers did not apply K, Zn and Mn, respectively to wheat, albeit of their deficiency in the soils. An assessment of yield gap showed a potential to increase the wheat grain yield upto 0.91t ha−1. Seed treatment before sowing resulted in an increase in wheat grain yield by 0.30 t ha−1 (6.1%). Nitrogen application at sowing increased wheat grain yield by 0.62 t ha−1 (13.6%), compared with plots without basal N application. Results of the survey showed a potential to increase wheat grain yield from 0.28–1.08 t ha−1 (6.5–25.6%) with foliar application of MnSO4. Therefore, understanding crop yield potentials and exploitable gaps in crop production is essential to increase grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 62.2 percent of surveyed wheat area used un-recommended varieties.

Outcome
wheat areae0
Value
∼622 per cente0
Qualifier
un-recommended varietiese0
Setting
Mansa (Punjab)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“∼622 per cent of wheat area in Mansa (Punjab)during 2012–16 was under un-recommended varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–446 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 35% of farmers used untreated wheat seed.

Outcome
farmers were using un-treated wheat seede0
Value
∼35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More than 1/3rd (∼35%) of farmers were using un-treated wheat seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–514 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers using untreated wheat seed experienced seed-borne disease infestation.

Treatment
un-treated wheat seede0
Outcome
infestation of seed borne diseasese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers were using un-treated wheat seed and therefore, experienced infestation of seed borne diseases at their fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 28 percent of farmers used higher-than-recommended wheat seed rates.

Outcome
seed ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
28 per cente0
Comparator
recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 28 per cent farmers were using higher seed rate than recommended (100 kg seed ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one tenth of farmers applied the recommended nitrogen rate to wheat.

Outcome
farmers apply fertilizer N to wheat at recommended ratee0
Value
1/10the0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 1/10th of farmers apply fertilizer N to wheat at recommended rate (125 kg N ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–859 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 81 percent of farmers omitted basal nitrogen.

Outcome
farmers did not apply basal N dosee0
Value
81 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 81 per cent farmers did not apply basal N dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–93 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting basal nitrogen was linked to lower-leaf nitrogen deficiency and reduced grain yield.

Organ / stage
lower wheat leavese0
Treatment
did not apply basal N dosee0
Outcome
crop grain yielde0
Direction
set-backe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not apply basal N dose, therefore, appearance of N deficiency on lower wheat leaves occur commonly, resulting in a significant set-back on crop grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ninety-one percent of farmers did not apply potassium to wheat.

Outcome
did not apply Ke0
Value
91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91, 79 and 67 per cent of farmers did not apply K, Zn and Mn, respectively to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventy-nine percent of farmers did not apply zinc to wheat.

Outcome
did not apply K, Zn and Mne0
Value
79e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91, 79 and 67 per cent of farmers did not apply K, Zn and Mn, respectively to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixty-seven percent of farmers did not apply manganese to wheat.

Outcome
did not apply K, Zn and Mne0
Value
67 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91, 79 and 67 per cent of farmers did not apply K, Zn and Mn, respectively to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-gap assessment indicated wheat grain yield could rise by up to 0.91t ha−1.

Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.91t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An assessment of yield gap showed a potential to increase the wheat grain yield upto 0.91t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment increased wheat grain yield by 0.30 t ha−1, or 6.1%.

Treatment
Seed treatment before sowinge0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.30 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
6.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment before sowing resulted in an increase in wheat grain yield by 0.30 t ha−1 (6.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at sowing increased wheat grain yield by 0.62 t ha−1 versus no basal nitrogen.

Treatment
Nitrogen application at sowinge0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.62 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
13.6%e0
Comparator
plots without basal N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application at sowing increased wheat grain yield by 0.62 t ha−1 (13.6%), compared with plots without basal N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MnSO4 was associated with potential wheat grain yield increases of 0.28–1.08 t ha−1.

Treatment
foliar application of MnSO4e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.28–1.08 t ha−1e0
Qualifier
6.5–25.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potential to increase wheat grain yield from 0.28–1.08 t ha−1 (6.5–25.6%) with foliar application of MnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1656 · show in text ↑

manganese(II) sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.