Paper · 2022 · Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Organic yellow passion fruit productivity due to irrigation, semi protected cultivation and artificial pollination

Nilciléia Mendes da Silva; Sebastião Elviro de Araújo Neto; Luís Gustavo de Souza e Souza; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the combination between irrigation, semiprotected cultivation, and artificial pollination on the yield, number of fruits, and mass of yellow passion fruit grown under organic production. The experimental design was in randomized blocks set up in split plots (2x2x2) with eight treatments and four replications. The plot consisted of irrigation or rainfed conditions, the second factor corresponds to plant cover with plastic or direct sunlight, and the third factor refers to natural or artificial pollination. Irrigation was performed using a micro-sprinkler system, and pollination was either manual or natural (entomophilous). The evaluated parameters were the number of fruits per plant, the mean fruit mass, and the total and commercial yields in two crop years: from January to August 2019 and from September 2019 to August 2020. The yield per hectare and the number of fruits per plant were not affected by irrigation and semi-protected cultivation. Artificial pollination increased the passion fruit yield by up to 31% under organic cultivation. The number of fruits per plant did not significantly change with the treatments. However, there was a positive linear correction with the yield. The mean fruit mass is higher using the combination between semi-protected cultivation, rainfed conditions, and artificial pollination or direct sunlight with natural pollination regardless of irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation did not significantly affect yield per hectare or fruit number.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
yield per hectare and the number of fruits per plante0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yield per hectare and the number of fruits per plant were not affected by irrigation and semi-protected cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-protected cultivation did not affect yield per hectare or fruit number.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
semi-protected cultivatione0
Outcome
yield per hectare and the number of fruits per plante0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yield per hectare and the number of fruits per plant were not affected by irrigation and semi-protected cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial pollination increased organic passion fruit yield by up to 31%.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
Artificial pollinatione0
Outcome
passion fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31%e0
Qualifier
under organic cultivatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Artificial pollination increased the passion fruit yield by up to 31% under organic cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number did not significantly change with treatments.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
number of fruits per plante0
Direction
did not significantly changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The number of fruits per plant did not significantly change with the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number was positively related to yield.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivee0

Verbatim

e0

“However, there was a positive linear correction with the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of fruits per plant did not significantly change with the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit mass was higher under semi-protected, rainfed, artificially pollinated conditions.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
semi-protected cultivation, rainfed conditions, and artificial pollinatione0
Outcome
mean fruit masse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mean fruit mass is higher using the combination between semi-protected cultivation, rainfed conditions, and artificial pollination or direct sunlight with natural pollination regardless of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit mass was higher under direct sunlight and natural pollination regardless of irrigation.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
direct sunlight with natural pollinatione0
Outcome
mean fruit masse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
regardless of irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mean fruit mass is higher using the combination between semi-protected cultivation, rainfed conditions, and artificial pollination or direct sunlight with natural pollination regardless of irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–28 · show in text ↑

pollination · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Hand pollination in the third flush gave the highest fruit set.

    Fruit Setting Behaviour of Passion Fruit · 2013 · compared with self-, and natural pollinations

    Same direction

  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.