Paper · 2021 · Revista Caatinga

YIELD AND QUALITY OF PASSION FRUIT UNDER ORGANIC CULTIVATION WITH INPUT LEVELS AND IRRIGATION IN THE STATE OF ACRE

THAYS LEMOS UCHOA; SEBASTIÃO ELVIRO DE ARAÚJO NETO; WAGNER DE MOURA FRANCISCO; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of organic fertilizers can improve the chemical, physical, and biological properties of the soil, with their use implying low environmental impact. This study aimed to evaluate the yield and quality of yellow passion fruit grown in an organic system associated with irrigation and input levels. A randomized complete block design in a 3x2 factorial arrangement with four replications was adopted. The factors evaluated were: three input levels (fertilizers and alternative pesticides) and the presence or absence of irrigation. Fertilization consisted of the application of 5, 10, and 15 liters of organic compost per plant and 500, 1,000, and 1,500 g of lime per plant, corresponding to input levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Topdressing fertilization was split into two applications, corresponding to 118, 235, and 353 g per plant of thermophosphate and 59.1, 118.20, and 176.40 g per plant of potassium sulfate for levels 1, 2, and 3 of input application, respectively. The alternative pesticides were sprayed every 30, 15, and 7 days for levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The number of fruits per plant and the yield increased using the input level 3 associated with irrigation. In the absence of irrigation, input levels 2 and 3 increased the content of soluble solids. The titratable acidity, TSS/TTA ratio, and the fruits classified as extra did not differ significantly between treatments. Input levels 1 and 2 associated with the absence of irrigation increased the percentage of fruits classified as commercial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input level 3 with irrigation increased the number of fruits per plant and the yield of yellow passion fruit.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
input level 3 associated with irrigatione0
Outcome
number of fruits per plant and the yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of fruits per plant and the yield increased using the input level 3 associated with irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without irrigation, input levels 2 and 3 increased the soluble solids content of passion fruit.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
input levels 2 and 3e0
Outcome
content of soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In the absence of irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the absence of irrigation, input levels 2 and 3 increased the content of soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity, TSS/TTA ratio and the share of extra-class fruits did not differ significantly between treatments.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
titratable acidity, TSS/TTA ratio, and the fruits classified as extrae0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The titratable acidity, TSS/TTA ratio, and the fruits classified as extra did not differ significantly between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input levels 1 and 2 without irrigation increased the percentage of fruits classified as commercial.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
Input levels 1 and 2 associated with the absence of irrigatione0
Outcome
percentage of fruits classified as commerciale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Input levels 1 and 2 associated with the absence of irrigation increased the percentage of fruits classified as commercial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1538 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.