Paper · 2022 · Revista Caatinga

PROFITABILITY OF ORGANIC YELLOW PASSION FRUIT AS A FUNCTION OF IRRIGATION, PROTECTED CULTIVATION AND POLLINATION

NILCILÉIA MENDES DA SILVA; SEBASTIÃO ELVIRO DE ARAÚJO NETO; LUÍS GUSTAVO DE SOUZA E SOUZA; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Passion fruit production has become an attractive activity due to its social and economic benefits, given the rapid economic return and well-distributed income over most of the year. From this perspective, this study aimed to evaluate the technical and economic indicators of yellow passion fruit cultivation by combining irrigation, protected cultivation, and pollination. The experimental design was in randomized blocks set up in split plots (2 x 2 x 2), with eight treatments and four replicates containing four plants per experimental unit. The protected environment was installed on the upper part of each trellis and consisted of 100 m transparent plastic film as cover material. Irrigation was performed using a micro-sprinkler system, and pollination was either manual or natural (entomophilous). The following parameters were evaluated: commercial yield - estimated for one hectare considering the mass of marketable fruits produced in the plot (30 m2); production cost - capital depreciation, input prices, and labor used in cultivation; economic indicators - profitability index, family labor remuneration, profitability, net income, benefit/cost ratio, and fixed, variable, and total costs. The results show that artificial pollination increased the yield and provided a 41% higher profitability rate than natural pollination; supplemental irrigation, compared to rainfed cultivation, has no positive effects on profitability indices; protected cultivation increases the total cost and does not 0increase the yield; organic passion fruit production provides profitability indices ranging from 60% to 70%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial pollination increased passion fruit yield relative to natural pollination.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
artificial pollinatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
natural pollinatione1

Verbatim

e0

“yellow passion fruit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial pollination increased the yield and provided a 41% higher profitability rate than natural pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial pollination gave a 41% higher profitability rate than natural pollination.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
artificial pollinatione1
Outcome
profitability ratee1
Direction
highere1
Value
41%e1
Comparator
natural pollinatione1

Verbatim

e0

“yellow passion fruit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial pollination increased the yield and provided a 41% higher profitability rate than natural pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation had no positive effect on profitability indices compared with rainfed cultivation.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
supplemental irrigatione1
Outcome
profitability indicese1
Direction
no positive effectse1
Comparator
rainfed cultivatione1

Verbatim

e0

“yellow passion fruit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“supplemental irrigation, compared to rainfed cultivation, has no positive effects on profitability indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected cultivation increased total cost.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
protected cultivatione1
Outcome
total coste1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yellow passion fruit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected cultivation increases the total cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected cultivation did not increase yield.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
protected cultivatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
does not 0increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yellow passion fruit cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–317 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected cultivation increases the total cost and does not 0increase the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1536 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic passion fruit production yielded profitability indices of 60% to 70%.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Outcome
profitability indicese0
Value
60% to 70%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic passion fruit production provides profitability indices ranging from 60% to 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1625 · show in text ↑

pollination · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Hand pollination in the third flush gave the highest fruit set.

    Fruit Setting Behaviour of Passion Fruit · 2013 · compared with self-, and natural pollinations

    Same direction

  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.