Abstract
Combinations of glufosinate with nicosulfuron, among other post-emergent herbicides, are promising for weed controlin maize. However, some of these herbicides can cause injury and have other undesirable effects on the maize, so it is necessaryto investigate their selectivity for cultivation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of glufosinate, nicosulfuron andcombinations, by analysing the agronomic performance of the crop for post-emergent application in maize hybrids with the pat gene.Two experiments were conducted in the state of Paraná, Brazil, during the 2019/2020 season, in a 2 x 8 (exp. I) and 2 x 4 (exp. II)factorial scheme. Two hybrids were used (FS505 PWU and FS715 PWU), with eight levels for the factor herbicide in experiment I(glufosinate, halosulfuron and glufosinate in combination with halosulfuron, nicosulfuron, atrazine, tembotrione or mesotrione, inaddition to the control with no application) and four levels of herbicide in experiment II (nicosulfuron in two formulations, mesotrione,and the control). Injury to the maize plants and variables related to agronomic performance were evaluated. Although the herbicideshad no effect on yield, it can be inferred that FS505 is more sensitive to nicosulfuron and mesotrione than is FS715, since the injurywas greater than seen in FS715. The post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinations is selective for the FS505PWU and FS715 PWU hybrids (with the pat gene). Despite injury, which was more pronounced in the FS505 PWU hybrid, there wasno negative impact on yield or on other the variables of agronomic performance.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides had no effect on maize yield compared with the control with no application.
- Treatment
- herbicidese1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- had no effecte1
- Comparator
- control with no applicatione0
- Setting
- Paraná, Brazile6
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrids”
e0“in addition to the control with no application”
e1“Although the herbicideshad no effect on yield”
e6“Two experiments were conducted in the state of Paraná, Brazil, during the 2019/2020 season”
Claim · model-written summary
Injury was greater in FS505 than in FS715 under nicosulfuron and mesotrione.
- Material
- FS505e2
- Treatment
- nicosulfuron and mesotrionee2
- Outcome
- injurye2
- Direction
- greatere2
- Comparator
- FS715e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrids”
e2“FS505 is more sensitive to nicosulfuron and mesotrione than is FS715, since the injury was greater than seen in FS715”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-emergent glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinations were selective for FS505PWU and FS715PWU hybrids carrying the pat gene.
- Material
- FS505PWU and FS715 PWUe3
- Treatment
- post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinationse3
- Gene
- pate3
- Outcome
- selectivee3
- Setting
- Paraná, Brazile6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrids”
e3“The post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinations is selective for the FS505PWU and FS715 PWU hybrids (with the pat gene)”
e6“Two experiments were conducted in the state of Paraná, Brazil, during the 2019/2020 season”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatments caused no negative impact on maize yield despite injury.
- Treatment
- post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinationse3
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- no negative impacte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrids”
e3“The post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinations is selective for the FS505PWU and FS715 PWU hybrids (with the pat gene)”
e4“there wasno negative impact on yield or on other the variables of agronomic performance”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatments caused no negative impact on other agronomic performance variables of maize despite injury.
- Treatment
- post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinationse3
- Outcome
- other the variables of agronomic performancee4
- Direction
- no negative impacte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize hybrids”
e3“The post-emergent application of glufosinate, nicosulfuron and combinations is selective for the FS505PWU and FS715 PWU hybrids (with the pat gene)”
e4“there wasno negative impact on yield or on other the variables of agronomic performance”
The same questions in other papers
glufosinate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →nicosulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →mesotrione · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →nicosulfuron · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.