Paper · 2021 · Annals of Plant and Soil Research

Nano-Urea for enhancing yield and farmers profit with potato in Uttar Pradesh

IFFCO, IFFCO Bhawan, 8 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh; K.N. Tiwari

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Conventional fertilizer application techniques are resulting in seriously overdosing of chemical fertilizers which has become evident through the phenomenon of eutrophication, volatilization, leaching, release of nitrous oxides and thus being the greenhouse gases, contribute to the global warming. Nanotechnology is a promising field of research which has the potential to offer sustainable remedies to pressing challenge scon fronted to modern intensive agriculture. Nanofertilizers hold potential to fulfill plant nutrition requirements along with imparting sustainability to crop production systems and that too without compromising the crops yield. The results of 187 trials conducted on farmers’ fields with potato have proved that the quantity of urea being applied by the farmers to supply nitrogen to the crop can be successfully reduced to half. The yields obtained with 50% less nitrogen as compared to FFP and applying 2 sprays of nano-nitrogen in standing crops gave yields higher than FFP in most of these trials. This paper describes the results of 187 on-farm trials conducted on potato during winter season of 2019-20 in Uttar Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying two nano-nitrogen sprays with 50% less nitrogen gave potato yields higher than FFP in most on-farm trials.

Treatment
applying 2 sprays of nano-nitrogen in standing cropse2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
in most of these trialse2
Comparator
FFPe2
Setting
Uttar Pradeshe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This paper describes the results of 187 on-farm trials conducted on potato during winter season of 2019-20 in Uttar Pradesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1152 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yields obtained with 50% less nitrogen as compared to FFP and applying 2 sprays of nano-nitrogen in standing crops gave yields higher than FFP in most of these trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1027 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urea application to potato can be successfully reduced to half without compromising yield.

Outcome
quantity of ureae3
Qualifier
successfully reduced to halfe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This paper describes the results of 187 on-farm trials conducted on potato during winter season of 2019-20 in Uttar Pradesh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1152 · show in text ↑
e3

“the quantity of urea being applied by the farmers to supply nitrogen to the crop can be successfully reduced to half”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–854 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.