Paper · 2021 · JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Effects of salt stress on the germination of two contrasting Medicago sativa varieties.

Cheima Jabri; Nawres Zaidi; Nourhene Maiza; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Selection strategies for increased salt tolerance in Medicago sativa must involve several growth stages, with the germination stage as a particularly important stage. At this stage, M. sativa is known to be more sensitive to salt than later growth stages. Cultivars differ significantly in their capacity to germinate under saline conditions. For this consideration and in order to analyze the response to salinity, initial screening at the germination stage for two varieties of M. sativa was undertaken. Seeds were germinated in Petri dishes under control treatment (0 mM NaCl) and four concentrations of NaCl (100, 150, 200 and 250 mM). Results from ANOVA showed that variation in root length (RL), fresh root weight (RFW) and shoot fresh weight (SFW) was explained by variety effect. The variation in hypocotyl length, (HL) SFW and RL was explained by the interaction of variety x treatment. Under salt stress, there was a major reduction (46, 66%) in final germination rate (GR) when seeds were geminated in 250 mM NaCl. The RL and HL were affected by salt stress and their respective values were reduced by more than 40% in 200 mM NaCl. The Californian variety was lesser affected by salt stress for RL and RFW while the local variety from El Hemma showed the lowest reduction for SFW. Further work is needed to asses these effects in later growth stages and in field conditions under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety explained variation in root length, fresh root weight and shoot fresh weight.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Material
varietye0
Outcome
root length (RL), fresh root weight (RFW) and shoot fresh weight (SFW)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in root length (RL), fresh root weight (RFW) and shoot fresh weight (SFW) was explained by variety effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety by treatment interaction explained hypocotyl length, shoot fresh weight and root length variation.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Material
varietye0
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
hypocotyl length, (HL) SFW and RLe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in hypocotyl length, (HL) SFW and RL was explained by the interaction of variety x treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM NaCl, final germination rate fell by 46% in one variety.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
250 mM NaCle0
Outcome
final germination rate (GR)e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
46, 66%e0
Comparator
control treatment (0 mM NaCl)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major reduction (46, 66%) in final germination rate (GR) when seeds were geminated in 250 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“control treatment (0 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 mM NaCl, final germination rate fell by 66% in the other variety.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
250 mM NaCle0
Outcome
final germination rate (GR)e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
46, 66%e0
Comparator
control treatment (0 mM NaCl)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“major reduction (46, 66%) in final germination rate (GR) when seeds were geminated in 250 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“control treatment (0 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length and hypocotyl length fell by more than 40% at 200 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
200 mM NaCle0
Outcome
RL and HLe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 40%e0
Comparator
control treatment (0 mM NaCl)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RL and HL were affected by salt stress and their respective values were reduced by more than 40% in 200 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“control treatment (0 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Californian variety had less salt impact on root length and fresh root weight.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Material
Californian varietye0
Outcome
RL and RFWe0
Direction
lesser affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Californian variety was lesser affected by salt stress for RL and RFW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The El Hemma local variety had the lowest reduction in shoot fresh weight.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Material
local varietye0
Outcome
SFWe0
Direction
lowest reductione0
Setting
El Hemmae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the local variety from El Hemma showed the lowest reduction for SFW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

43 papers: 4 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.