Paper · 2022 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The Response of Three Barley Cultivars to Cumin Extract at Different Soaking Times and the Identification of the Active Compounds Using GCMS

Mohammed A. Ibrahim; Jassim A. Hayawi; Fatima I. Sultan

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The research was carried out at the Agricultural Technical College / Mosul, to study the effect of cumin extract on barley culture with three factors, the first is (comparator and cumin extract), the second is the duration of soaking (6 and 12) hours, and the third is barley varieties (local, rayhan, zanbaqa), using the design of (CRD) and three replicates. At the end of the research, the data were recorded and analyzed according to the SAS program, and the different averages were distinguished by different alphabets, and the results were: Cumin extract was significantly superior to the control treatment in all studied traits, except for the number of roots. The duration of (12) hours was significantly superior to the duration of (6) hours in the wet and dry weight of the seedling. The barley zanbaqa cultivar outperformed the local and rayhan cultivars in all the studied traits. The interaction between cumin extract and the duration of (12) hours achieved significant superiority in all the studied traits. The interaction between cumin extract and zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior in seedling wet weight, root length and vegetative length. The interaction between the period (12) hours and the zanbaqa variety caused a significant superiority in all the studied traits. The interaction between cumin extract, duration (12) hours, and zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior to the rest of the interactions in wet and dry weight and root length.. The active compounds separated from the aqueous extract of cumin were diagnosed by GCMS and it was found that there are 9 compounds, 2 of which are phenolic and 7 of which are fatty acids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumin extract was significantly superior to the control treatment in all studied barley seedling traits except number of roots.

Treatment
Cumin extracte0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cumin extract was significantly superior to the control treatment in all studied traits, except for the number of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumin extract did not show superiority over the control in number of roots of barley seedlings.

Treatment
Cumin extracte0
Outcome
number of rootse0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cumin extract was significantly superior to the control treatment in all studied traits, except for the number of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 12-hour soaking duration was significantly superior to 6 hours in wet and dry weight of the seedling.

Treatment
duration of (12) hourse0
Outcome
wet and dry weight of the seedlinge0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
duration of (6) hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The duration of (12) hours was significantly superior to the duration of (6) hours in the wet and dry weight of the seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–800 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The barley cultivar zanbaqa outperformed the local and rayhan cultivars in all the studied traits.

Material
zanbaqae0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
local and rayhan cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The barley zanbaqa cultivar outperformed the local and rayhan cultivars in all the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between cumin extract and 12-hour soaking was significantly superior in all the studied traits.

Treatment
cumin extract and the duration of (12) hourse0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction between cumin extract and the duration of (12) hours achieved significant superiority in all the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between cumin extract and the zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior in seedling wet weight, root length and vegetative length.

Material
zanbaqae0
Treatment
cumin extracte0
Outcome
seedling wet weight, root length and vegetative lengthe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction between cumin extract and zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior in seedling wet weight, root length and vegetative length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between the 12-hour period and the zanbaqa variety gave significant superiority in all the studied traits.

Material
zanbaqae0
Treatment
period (12) hourse0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction between the period (12) hours and the zanbaqa variety caused a significant superiority in all the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction of cumin extract, 12-hour duration and zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior to the other interactions in wet and dry weight and root length.

Treatment
cumin extract, duration (12) hours, and zanbaqa cultivare0
Outcome
wet and dry weight and root lengthe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the rest of the interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction between cumin extract, duration (12) hours, and zanbaqa cultivar was significantly superior to the rest of the interactions in wet and dry weight and root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GCMS identified 9 compounds in the aqueous cumin extract, 2 phenolic and 7 fatty acids.

Outcome
9 compounds, 2 of which are phenolic and 7 of which are fatty acidse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cuminum cyminum
Cuminum cyminum · TaxonHerbolario Allium: www.alliumherbal.com · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous extract of cumin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“there are 9 compounds, 2 of which are phenolic and 7 of which are fatty acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1672 · show in text ↑

Cuminum cyminum · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 48 positive, 36 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.