Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Effects of strontium on the morphological and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Vicia faba seedlings

Xi Chen; Ningying Zhong; Yayun Luo; et al.

15
claims
37
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The adaptation of plants to strontium (Sr) stress requires a more systematic understanding. In the present study, the morphological and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Vicia faba seedlings under Sr stress (88Sr, 0–1,000 mg·L−1) were analyzed in solution culture. The results showed that Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly, but fortunately, there was almost no root necrosis. In plant morphology, the taproot length, lateral root number, plant height, branching number and internodes number of V. faba were significantly inhibited, thus the apical dominance of taproot and terminal bud was more obvious. The accumulation of Sr resulted in the decrease of leaf area, dry weight, stomatal density and stomatal aperture, while the guard cell length increased, and the specific leaf weight (SLW) increased first and then decreased. These changes in stomatal morphology may be a positive regulation to reduce water loss. In addition, V. faba increased the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and the activities of peroxidase (POD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) to protect the photosynthetic structure. Low concentration of Sr (250 mg·L−1) promoted the photochemical efficiency and electron transfer of PSII (e.g., increased Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, qP and ETR). However, Sr (250–1,000 mg·L−1) inhibited the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs) in leaves. In general, the Pn was affected by both stomatal and non-stomatal factors. Since Sr did not cause significant damage to the PSII function, the non-stomatal factor may be the dark reaction in photosynthesis affected, but this needs to be proved by further studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strontium treatment significantly decreased biomass and root activity of Vicia faba seedlings.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
biomass and root activitye1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strontium treatment caused almost no root necrosis in Vicia faba seedlings.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
root necrosise2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was almost no root necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strontium significantly inhibited taproot length, lateral root number and plant height of V. faba.

Taxon
V. fabaVicia fabae3
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
taproot length, lateral root number, plant heighte3
Direction
inhibitede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
e3

“the taproot length, lateral root number, plant height, branching number and internodes number of V. faba were significantly inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strontium significantly inhibited branching number and internodes number of V. faba.

Taxon
V. fabaVicia fabae3
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
branching number and internodes numbere3
Direction
inhibitede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
e3

“the taproot length, lateral root number, plant height, branching number and internodes number of V. faba were significantly inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strontium made the apical dominance of the taproot and terminal bud of Vicia faba more obvious.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
apical dominance of taproot and terminal bude4
Direction
more obviouse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
e4

“the apical dominance of taproot and terminal bud was more obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated Sr decreased leaf area, dry weight and stomatal density of Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
accumulation of Sre5
Outcome
leaf area, dry weight, stomatal densitye5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“The accumulation of Sr resulted in the decrease of leaf area, dry weight, stomatal density and stomatal aperture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated Sr decreased stomatal aperture of Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
accumulation of Sre5
Outcome
stomatal aperturee5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“The accumulation of Sr resulted in the decrease of leaf area, dry weight, stomatal density and stomatal aperture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated Sr increased guard cell length of Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
accumulation of Sre5
Outcome
guard cell lengthe6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“The accumulation of Sr resulted in the decrease of leaf area, dry weight, stomatal density and stomatal aperture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
e6

“the guard cell length increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulated Sr raised specific leaf weight first and then lowered it in Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
accumulation of Sre5
Outcome
specific leaf weight (SLW)e7
Direction
increased first and then decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“The accumulation of Sr resulted in the decrease of leaf area, dry weight, stomatal density and stomatal aperture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–784 · show in text ↑
e7

“the specific leaf weight (SLW) increased first and then decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–894 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in stomatal morphology may be a positive regulation that reduces water loss in Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Outcome
reduce water losse5
Qualifier
changes in stomatal morphologye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“These changes in stomatal morphology may be a positive regulation to reduce water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicia faba increased non-photochemical quenching and peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase activities under Sr stress, protecting the photosynthetic structure.

Taxon
V. fabaVicia fabae5
Treatment
Sr treatmente1
Outcome
non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and the activities of peroxidase (POD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
to protect the photosynthetic structuree5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sr treatment decreased the biomass and root activity of V. faba seedlings significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 · show in text ↑
e5

“V. faba increased the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and the activities of peroxidase (POD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) to protect the photosynthetic structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low Sr concentration (250 mg·L−1) promoted photochemical efficiency and electron transfer of PSII in Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Low concentration of Sr (250 mg·L−1)e5
Outcome
photochemical efficiency and electron transfer of PSIIe5
Direction
promotede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Low concentration of Sr (250 mg·L−1) promoted the photochemical efficiency and electron transfer of PSII”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sr at 250–1,000 mg·L−1 inhibited net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance in Vicia faba leaves.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sr (250–1,000 mg·L−1)e5
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs)e5
Direction
inhibitede5
Qualifier
in leavese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sr (250–1,000 mg·L−1) inhibited the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs) in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1451 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate in Vicia faba is affected by both stomatal and non-stomatal factors.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Outcome
Pne5
Qualifier
both stomatal and non-stomatal factorse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“the Pn was affected by both stomatal and non-stomatal factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sr did not cause significant damage to the PSII function of Vicia faba.

Taxon
Vicia fabaVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sre5
Outcome
damage to the PSII functione5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“Since Sr did not cause significant damage to the PSII function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1590 · show in text ↑