Paper · 1973 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Female Flower Induction on Androecious Cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.1

J. J. Augustine; L. R. Baker; H. M. Sell

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Ethephon applied as a foliar spray caused an androecious (all-male) line of Cucumis sativus L. to produce pistillate flowers analogous to those of monoecious phenotypes. The degree of conversion depended on the concentration of ethephon and stage of growth at the time of application. In the greenhouse, a concentration of 50 ppm applied at the 3- or 4-leaf stage was the best treatment for induction of pistillate flowers without marked inhibition of growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ethephon caused an all-male cucumber line to produce pistillate flowers.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativuse0
Material
androecious (all-male) linee0
Treatment
Ethephon applied as a foliar spraye0
Outcome
pistillate flowerse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon applied as a foliar spray caused an androecious (all-male) line of Cucumis sativus L. to produce pistillate flowers analogous to those of monoecious phenotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–178 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conversion to female flowers depended on ethephon concentration and growth stage.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
stage of growthe0
Treatment
concentration of ethephone0
Outcome
degree of conversione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of conversion depended on the concentration of ethephon and stage of growth at the time of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse, 50 ppm at the 3- or 4-leaf stage best induced female flowers without marked growth inhibition.

Taxon
Cucumis sativus L.Cucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
3- or 4-leaf stagee0
Treatment
50 ppme0
Outcome
induction of pistillate flowerse0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
without marked inhibition of growthe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, a concentration of 50 ppm applied at the 3- or 4-leaf stage was the best treatment for induction of pistillate flowers without marked inhibition of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumis sativus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.