Paper · 2022 · Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences

A preliminary study on nickel tolerance of some barley genotypes

Ali Doğru; Hüseyin Altundağ; Mustafa Şahin Dündar; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, nickel tolerance (NiSO4.7H2O) of some Turkish national barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes (Bülbül-89, Kalaycı-97, Karatay-94, Larende, Tarm-92, Tokak-157/37, Yesevi-93 and Zeynel Ağa) was investigated. Barley genotypes were exposed to different nickel concentrations [0 mM (control), 250, 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 ppm]. Nickel toxicity significantly inhibited root and coleoptile growth in all barley genotypes in a concentration-dependent manner. However, root growth was much more inhibited by nickel applications in comparison with coleoptile growth, probably due to a higher level of sensitivity of root meristems against nickel toxicity or direct contact of roots with nickel ions in the growth medium. Root growth in the genotype Karatay-94 and coleoptile growth in the genotype Yesevi-93 was more remarkably reduced by nickel toxicity. Root and coleoptile growth in the genotypes Larende and Kalaycı-97 were less affected under nickel toxicity, respectively. In addition, nickel toxicity disturbed water relations in barley genotypes dependent on the organ type, as demonstrated by more severe inhibition in root fresh weight as compared to coleoptile fresh weight. These results could show that nickel toxicity reduced water uptake from growth medium in barley genotypes used in this study. Changes in dry weight of roots and coleoptiles indicated that nickel toxicity more severely decreased biomass accumulation in roots of barley genotypes. The calculated tolerance indices demonstrated that the genotype Kalaycı-97 is the most tolerant to nickel toxicity, while the genotype Karatay-94 is the most susceptible one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel inhibited barley root and coleoptile growth in a concentration-dependent manner.

Treatment
Nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
root and coleoptile growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel toxicity significantly inhibited root and coleoptile growth in all barley genotypes in a concentration-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel inhibited roots more than coleoptiles.

Treatment
nickel applicationse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
coleoptile growthe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“root growth was much more inhibited by nickel applications in comparison with coleoptile growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karatay-94 root growth was especially reduced by nickel.

Material
Karatay-94e0
Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth in the genotype Karatay-94 and coleoptile growth in the genotype Yesevi-93 was more remarkably reduced by nickel toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yesevi-93 coleoptile growth was especially reduced by nickel.

Material
Yesevi-93e0
Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
coleoptile growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth in the genotype Karatay-94 and coleoptile growth in the genotype Yesevi-93 was more remarkably reduced by nickel toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larende root growth was less affected by nickel.

Material
Larendee0
Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
Roote0
Direction
less affectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root and coleoptile growth in the genotypes Larende and Kalaycı-97 were less affected under nickel toxicity, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalaycı-97 coleoptile growth was less affected by nickel.

Material
Kalaycı-97e0
Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
coleoptile growthe0
Direction
less affectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root and coleoptile growth in the genotypes Larende and Kalaycı-97 were less affected under nickel toxicity, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel inhibited root fresh weight more severely than coleoptile fresh weight.

Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
inhibitione0
Comparator
coleoptile fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nickel toxicity disturbed water relations in barley genotypes dependent on the organ type, as demonstrated by more severe inhibition in root fresh weight as compared to coleoptile fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel more severely decreased root biomass accumulation.

Treatment
nickel toxicitye0
Outcome
biomass accumulation in rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nickel toxicity more severely decreased biomass accumulation in roots of barley genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalaycı-97 was the most nickel tolerant genotype.

Material
Kalaycı-97e0
Outcome
most tolerant to nickel toxicitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype Kalaycı-97 is the most tolerant to nickel toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1585 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karatay-94 was the most nickel susceptible genotype.

Material
Karatay-94e0
Outcome
most susceptible onee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype Karatay-94 is the most susceptible one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1644 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.