Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Production

A UNIQUE RAPID HOT WATER TREATMENT AND WRAPPING TO IMPROVE STORAGE QUALITY OF CANTALOUPE FRUITS

M. Ezzat,

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This experiment consists of twenty four treatments, resulted from the combination of two cantaloupe cultivars (Vicar and Total) X four hot water dipping treatments [untreated (control), 50oC for 2 min., 55oC for 1 min and 60oC for 30 s) X three wrapping treatments unwrapping (control); wrapping with PVC and wrapping with stretch fruits. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of variety, hot water treatments and over wrapping on storability. Results were recorded on changes in physical and chemical properties in fruits during storage i.e. weight loss, decay, firmness, T.S.S., and total sugar contents. The main results can be summarized as follow: 1- Vicar cv. exhibited the least in weight loss and decay percent compared with Total cultivar. 2- Vicar cv. showed the highest firmness value than Total cv. 3- There were significant increases in weight loss and decay percent during storage period. Moreover, the rate of decrement in firmness was much higher with prolongation the storage period. 4- In relation to T.S.S. and total sugar contents, Vicar cv. showed the highest values compared with Total in both years. However, Total fruits were significantly lower in T.S.S. percentage and total sugar contents. 5- There were no significant differences was observed in weight loss %, T.S.S. % and total sugar content within most of the hot water treatments. 6- Significant difference was observed with decay incidence; the fruit at 55oC for about 1 min significantly reduce incidence, compared with control and the other treatments. 7- Fruit that were dipped at 55oC for about 1 min or 60oC for about 30 s were significantly firmer than other treatments. 8- Over wrapping fruits with PVC or stretch films had the lowest values of weight loss and decay percent as compared with unwrapped fruits (control), these results also indicated that there was significant increment in the rate of wrapping fruits firmness compared with those unwrapped ones. Moreover, T.S.S. % and total sugar contents were not significantly affected by any wrapping treatments under cold storage conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicar had less weight loss and decay than Total.

Material
Vicare0
Outcome
weight loss and decay percente0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
Total cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vicar cv. exhibited the least in weight loss and decay percent compared with Total cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicar fruit was firmer than Total fruit.

Material
Vicare0
Outcome
firmness valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Totale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vicar cv. showed the highest firmness value than Total cv.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight loss and decay increased during storage.

Outcome
weight loss and decay percente0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant increases in weight loss and decay percent during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness declined faster as storage was prolonged.

Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
decremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of decrement in firmness was much higher with prolongation the storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vicar had higher T.S.S. and total sugar than Total in both years.

Material
Vicare0
Outcome
T.S.S. percentage and total sugar contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Totale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vicar cv. showed the highest values compared with Total in both years. However, Total fruits were significantly lower in T.S.S. percentage and total sugar contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most hot water treatments did not significantly differ in weight loss, T.S.S. and sugar content.

Treatment
hot water treatmentse0
Outcome
weight loss %, T.S.S. % and total sugar contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences was observed in weight loss %, T.S.S. % and total sugar content within most of the hot water treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 55oC, one minute dip reduced decay incidence versus control and other dips.

Treatment
55oC for about 1 mine0
Outcome
decay incidencee1
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
control and the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit at 55oC for about 1 min significantly reduce incidence, compared with control and the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant difference was observed with decay incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 55oC, one minute dip produced firmer fruit than other treatments.

Treatment
dipped at 55oC for about 1 mine0
Outcome
Fruite0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit that were dipped at 55oC for about 1 min or 60oC for about 30 s were significantly firmer than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60oC, 30 second dip produced firmer fruit than other treatments.

Treatment
60oC for about 30 se0
Outcome
Fruite0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit that were dipped at 55oC for about 1 min or 60oC for about 30 s were significantly firmer than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVC wrapping reduced weight loss and decay versus unwrapped fruit.

Treatment
PVCe0
Outcome
weight loss and decay percente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
unwrapped fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over wrapping fruits with PVC or stretch films had the lowest values of weight loss and decay percent as compared with unwrapped fruits (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1821 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stretch film wrapping reduced weight loss and decay versus unwrapped fruit.

Treatment
stretch filmse0
Outcome
weight loss and decay percente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
unwrapped fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over wrapping fruits with PVC or stretch films had the lowest values of weight loss and decay percent as compared with unwrapped fruits (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1821 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wrapping increased fruit firmness versus unwrapped fruit.

Treatment
wrappinge0
Outcome
fruits firmnesse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
unwrapped onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was significant increment in the rate of wrapping fruits firmness compared with those unwrapped ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wrapping did not significantly affect T.S.S. or total sugar in cold storage.

Treatment
wrapping treatmentse0
Outcome
T.S.S. % and total sugar contentse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0
Setting
cold storage conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T.S.S. % and total sugar contents were not significantly affected by any wrapping treatments under cold storage conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2098 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANTALOUPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.