Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integration of raised beds, mulching and stem training for weed management in tomato under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Shilpa; Priyanka Bijalwan; Y.R. Shukla; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm of Vegetable Science, DR YSPUHF, Nauni, Solan (HP), India to evaluate the effect of polythene mulches, planting methods and training systems on weed control and yield response of tomato crop. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with twelve treatments and replicated thrice. The consortium effect of raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training have recorded less weed density (142.00/m2), greater weed control efficiency (64.64%), less fresh (82.00 g/m2) and dry weed biomass (13.00 g/m2) and higher yield (100.12 t/ha). The dominance of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa crus-galli and Galinsoga parviflora weed species was also less with the integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training system. This practice helps in the tomato production with better water conservation; weed management and improved tomato yield under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined raised beds, black mulch and two-stem training gave weed density of 142.00/m2.

Treatment
raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem traininge0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
142.00/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training have recorded less weed density (142.00/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment achieved 64.64% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem traininge1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
64.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater weed control efficiency (64.64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–533 · show in text ↑
e1

“raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced fresh weed biomass to 82.00 g/m2.

Treatment
raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem traininge1
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
82.00 g/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less fresh (82.00 g/m2) and dry weed biomass (13.00 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced dry weed biomass to 13.00 g/m2.

Treatment
raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem traininge1
Outcome
dry weed biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
13.00 g/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less fresh (82.00 g/m2) and dry weed biomass (13.00 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment increased tomato yield to 100.12 t/ha.

Treatment
raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem traininge1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
100.12 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher yield (100.12 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–623 · show in text ↑
e1

“raised bed (RB) + black polythene mulch (BPM) + two stem training”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–447 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyperus rotundus dominance was lower under the integrated treatment.

Taxon
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0
Treatment
integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training systeme0
Interactor
tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1weede0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · InteractorKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominance of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa crus-galli and Galinsoga parviflora weed species was also less with the integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Echinochloa crus-galli dominance was lower under the integrated treatment.

Taxon
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0
Treatment
integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training systeme0
Interactor
tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1weede0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · InteractorKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominance of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa crus-galli and Galinsoga parviflora weed species was also less with the integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Galinsoga parviflora dominance was lower under the integrated treatment.

Taxon
Galinsoga parvifloraGalinsoga parviflorae0
Treatment
integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training systeme0
Interactor
tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1weede0
Outcome
dominancee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Galinsoga parviflora
Galinsoga parviflora · TaxonJuan Carlos Fonseca Mata · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · InteractorKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominance of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa crus-galli and Galinsoga parviflora weed species was also less with the integration of raised bed, black polythene mulch and two stem training system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response of tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–244 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the integrated practice for water conservation, weed management and tomato yield.

Outcome
better water conservation; weed management and improved tomato yielde0
Setting
Himachal Pradeshe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This practice helps in the tomato production with better water conservation; weed management and improved tomato yield under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–987 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

tillage · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 40 positive, 16 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

206 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.