Paper · 2022 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Water productivity in cultivating the cowpea under different production systems

Erialdo de Oliveira Feitosa; Fernando Bezerra Lopes; Eunice Maia de Andrade; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The increase in irrigated areas and the water crisis in numerous regions have encouraged the use of irrigation systems and management that afford greater efficiency in the use of water. Wastewater is one option for maximising this efficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indicators of water productivity in the cultivation of irrigated cowpea under different production systems. The study was carried out in the experimental area of the Sewage Treatment Station (ETE) located in Tianguá, Ceará. The experiment consisted of six production systems (treatments) in subdivided plots distributed in a completely randomised design (CRD) with fifteen replications in a (2 x 3) factorial scheme, i.e. two sources of water and energy: drinking water + electricity from the electrical grid (conventional system) and wastewater + solar photovoltaic energy (alternative system), and the different sources of fertiliser (mineral and organic), in addition to the control treatments. The water productivity indicator that expresses the relationship between the yield of the crop and the volume of water applied was determined, and the index in economic terms between crop yield and the volume of water applied. The system using wastewater and organic fertiliser showed better water productivity, 0.422 kg m-3, while the system that used drinking water with no fertiliser showed less efficiency, 0.188 kg m-3. Water use efficiency in the systems that used wastewater was higher in relation to the systems that used drinking water. Irrigation with treated domestic effluent increases water productivity and water use efficiency, in addition to being a strategy for agricultural exploitation under conditions of water scarcity

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wastewater with organic fertiliser gave better cowpea water productivity than drinking water with no fertiliser.

Treatment
wastewater and organic fertilisere2
Outcome
water productivitye2
Direction
bettere2
Value
0.422 kg m-3e2
Comparator
drinking water with no fertilisere2
Setting
Tianguá, Cearáe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the cultivation of irrigated cowpea under different production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–391 · show in text ↑
e2

“The system using wastewater and organic fertiliser showed better water productivity, 0.422 kg m-3, while the system that used drinking water with no fertiliser showed less efficiency, 0.188 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1406 · show in text ↑
e3

“carried out in the experimental area of the Sewage Treatment Station (ETE) located in Tianguá, Ceará”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was higher in systems using wastewater than in systems using drinking water.

Treatment
systems that used wastewatere4
Outcome
Water use efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
systems that used drinking watere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the cultivation of irrigated cowpea under different production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–391 · show in text ↑
e4

“Water use efficiency in the systems that used wastewater was higher in relation to the systems that used drinking water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1527 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with treated domestic effluent is a strategy for cowpea agricultural exploitation under water scarcity.

Treatment
Irrigation with treated domestic effluente5
Outcome
strategy for agricultural exploitation under conditions of water scarcitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the cultivation of irrigated cowpea under different production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–391 · show in text ↑
e5

“Irrigation with treated domestic effluent increases water productivity and water use efficiency, in addition to being a strategy for agricultural exploitation under conditions of water scarcity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1722 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.