Paper · 2011 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON COWPEA YIELD, ITS COMPONENTS AND WATER PRODUCTIVITY IN NORTH DELTA OF EGYPT.

Gh. Sh. El-Atawy; M. H. Kasem

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were performed at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, (31° 05’ N latitude and 30° 56’ E longitude), Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, during the two growing summer seasons of 2009 and 2010, to study the effect of deficit irrigation by watering after 50%, 70% and 90% of available soil moisture deficit (ASMD) and four levels of nitrogen fertilization at 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg N fed.-1 on cowpea yield, its components and water productivity in North Delta of Egypt. A split-plot design with four replicates was used. Mean values of seasonal water consumptive use were 42.17, 37.05 and 30.12cm in the 1st season and 41.22, 36.51 and 29.67 cm in the 2nd season for the 50%, 70% and 90% of ASMD, respectively and seasonal amounts of irrigation water applied for cowpea were 63.10 cm, 54.09 cm and 43.10 cm in the 1st season and 61.66, 53.33 and 42.40 cm in the 2nd season for 50%, 70% and 90% of ASMD, respectively. Results revealed that the highest values of plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content were obtained from irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the first season, while the highest values of seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1 and number of pods plant-1 were obtained from irrigation at 70% of ASMD in the both seasons. The mean results showed that adding 40 kg N fed.-1 significantly increased plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content in both seasons, while adding 30 kg N fed.-1 gave the highest mean values of seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1,number of pods plant-1 and 100-seed weight in both seasons. The highest values of water productivity (WP) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW) were 0.763and 0.541kg m-3 in the 1st season and 0.568 and 0.403 kg of seeds m-3 in the 2nd season as a result of irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1 in the both seasons. Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced WP by 29.7 and 33.4% and PIW by 35.9 and 39.7% compared to irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the two seasons, respectively. WP and PIW increased by increasing N application up to 30 kg N fed.-1. It can be recommended that the best results under the experimental conditions were irrigating cowpea cultivars at 70% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 50% of ASMD gave the highest plant height, number of leaves and number of branches in the first season.

Treatment
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1e1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in the first seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest values of plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content were obtained from irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 50% of ASMD gave the highest chlorophyll content in the first season.

Treatment
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in the first seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest values of plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content were obtained from irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 70% of ASMD gave the highest seed yield per plant, seed yield per feddan and number of pods per plant in both seasons.

Treatment
irrigation at 70% of ASMDe2
Outcome
seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1 and number of pods plant-1e2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in the both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest values of seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1 and number of pods plant-1 were obtained from irrigation at 70% of ASMD in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 40 kg N per feddan significantly increased plant height, number of leaves and number of branches in both seasons.

Treatment
adding 40 kg N fed.-1e3
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1e3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
in both seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“adding 40 kg N fed.-1 significantly increased plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 40 kg N per feddan significantly increased chlorophyll content in both seasons.

Treatment
adding 40 kg N fed.-1e3
Outcome
chlorophyll contente3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
in both seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“adding 40 kg N fed.-1 significantly increased plant height, number of leaves plant-1, number of branches plant-1 and chlorophyll content in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 30 kg N per feddan gave the highest seed yield per plant, seed yield per feddan and number of pods per plant in both seasons.

Treatment
adding 30 kg N fed.-1e4
Outcome
seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1,number of pods plant-1e4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
in both seasonse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“adding 30 kg N fed.-1 gave the highest mean values of seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1,number of pods plant-1 and 100-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 30 kg N per feddan gave the highest 100-seed weight in both seasons.

Treatment
adding 30 kg N fed.-1e4
Outcome
100-seed weighte4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
in both seasonse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“adding 30 kg N fed.-1 gave the highest mean values of seed yield plant-1, seed yield fed.-1,number of pods plant-1 and 100-seed weight in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD with 30 kg N gave the highest water productivity of 0.763 in the first season.

Treatment
irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1e5
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.763e5
Qualifier
in the 1st seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest values of water productivity (WP) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW) were 0.763and 0.541kg m-3 in the 1st season and 0.568 and 0.403 kg of seeds m-3 in the 2nd season as a result of irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1 in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD with 30 kg N gave the highest water productivity of 0.568 in the second season.

Treatment
irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1e5
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.568e5
Qualifier
in the 2nd seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest values of water productivity (WP) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW) were 0.763and 0.541kg m-3 in the 1st season and 0.568 and 0.403 kg of seeds m-3 in the 2nd season as a result of irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1 in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD with 30 kg N gave the highest productivity of irrigation water of 0.541 in the first season.

Treatment
irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1e5
Outcome
productivity of irrigation water (PIW)e5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.541e5
Qualifier
in the 1st seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest values of water productivity (WP) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW) were 0.763and 0.541kg m-3 in the 1st season and 0.568 and 0.403 kg of seeds m-3 in the 2nd season as a result of irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1 in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD with 30 kg N gave the highest productivity of irrigation water of 0.403 in the second season.

Treatment
irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1e5
Outcome
productivity of irrigation water (PIW)e5
Direction
higheste5
Value
0.403e5
Qualifier
in the 2nd seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest values of water productivity (WP) and productivity of irrigation water (PIW) were 0.763and 0.541kg m-3 in the 1st season and 0.568 and 0.403 kg of seeds m-3 in the 2nd season as a result of irrigation at 90% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1 in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced water productivity by 29.7% relative to 50% of ASMD.

Treatment
Irrigation at 90% of ASMDe6
Outcome
WPe6
Direction
enhancede6
Value
29.7e6
Qualifier
in the two seasons, respectivelye6
Comparator
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced WP by 29.7 and 33.4% and PIW by 35.9 and 39.7% compared to irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced water productivity by 33.4% relative to 50% of ASMD.

Treatment
Irrigation at 90% of ASMDe6
Outcome
WPe6
Direction
enhancede6
Value
33.4e6
Qualifier
in the two seasons, respectivelye6
Comparator
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced WP by 29.7 and 33.4% and PIW by 35.9 and 39.7% compared to irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced productivity of irrigation water by 35.9% relative to 50% of ASMD.

Treatment
Irrigation at 90% of ASMDe6
Outcome
PIWe6
Direction
enhancede6
Value
35.9e6
Qualifier
in the two seasons, respectivelye6
Comparator
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced WP by 29.7 and 33.4% and PIW by 35.9 and 39.7% compared to irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced productivity of irrigation water by 39.7% relative to 50% of ASMD.

Treatment
Irrigation at 90% of ASMDe6
Outcome
PIWe6
Direction
enhancede6
Value
39.7e6
Qualifier
in the two seasons, respectivelye6
Comparator
irrigation at 50% of ASMDe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e6

“Irrigation at 90% of ASMD enhanced WP by 29.7 and 33.4% and PIW by 35.9 and 39.7% compared to irrigation at 50% of ASMD in the two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–2068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity and productivity of irrigation water increased with increasing nitrogen up to 30 kg N per feddan.

Treatment
increasing N application up to 30 kg N fed.-1e7
Outcome
WP and PIWe7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e7

“WP and PIW increased by increasing N application up to 30 kg N fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2139 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating cowpea cultivars at 70% of ASMD with 30 kg N per feddan is recommended under the experimental conditions.

Outcome
irrigating cowpea cultivars at 70% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be recommended that the best results under the experimental conditions were irrigating cowpea cultivars at 70% of ASMD and fertilization with 30 kg N fed.-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2141–2304 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seasonal water consumptive use was 42.17, 37.05 and 30.12 cm in the first season.

Outcome
seasonal water consumptive usee1
Value
42.17, 37.05 and 30.12cme1
Qualifier
in the 1st seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean values of seasonal water consumptive use were 42.17, 37.05 and 30.12cm in the 1st season and 41.22, 36.51 and 29.67 cm in the 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seasonal water consumptive use was 41.22, 36.51 and 29.67 cm in the second season.

Outcome
seasonal water consumptive usee1
Value
41.22, 36.51 and 29.67 cme1
Qualifier
in the 2nd seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mean values of seasonal water consumptive use were 42.17, 37.05 and 30.12cm in the 1st season and 41.22, 36.51 and 29.67 cm in the 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–673 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

27 papers: 8 positive, 19 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.