Paper · 2010 · Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America

Effect of water stress applied at different stages of growth on seed yield and water-use efficiency of cowpea.

Faisal Ahmed; Ahmad S. Suliman

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, 13314 Shambat, Sudan *Cell phone: +249912988847 ABSTRACT Previous studies report conflicting results regarding the sensitivity of cowpeas (Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp.) to growth stage water deficits. A field study was designed to monitor the effects of water deficit imposed at different growth stages on yield and water use of cowpeas and to identify any critical stages of development when cowpea is particularly sensitive to water deficits. The experiment was conducted for two consecutive seasons during 2005/06 and 2006/07, plus a pot experiment in the Demonstration Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture at Shambat, Sudan. Three contrasting cowpea genotypes were used in this study, namely; Ein el Ghazal (an introduced cultivar), Zalingei (local type) and Elobied (local type). The well-watered plants were irrigated at 10 days interval and in the stress treatments water was applied at 20 days interval during the vegetative stage (SV), the reproductive stage (SR) and both stages (CS). The results showed that, the reproductive stage of development is the most sensitive to water deficit in cowpea, causing a reduction in water-use efficiencies and seed yields of at least 50% in all three genotypes. In contrast, the genotypes showed a better ability to recover from stress at vegetative stage. The reduction in seed yield was associated with reductions in number of harvested pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and seed size. Differences between the genotypes were significant and in this regard, the introduced cultivar had better yield and higher water-use efficiency compared to the local types. This study suggests that there is considerable variation between cowpea genotypes in tolerance to water stress, and that maximizing the number of pods and seeds are among the most important traits for maintaining stable and high seed yields under water deficit conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive-stage water deficit reduced water-use efficiency by at least 50% across three genotypes.

Organ / stage
reproductive stage of developmente0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
water-use efficienciese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
at least 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reproductive stage of development is the most sensitive to water deficit in cowpea, causing a reduction in water-use efficiencies and seed yields of at least 50% in all three genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive-stage water deficit reduced seed yield by at least 50% across three genotypes.

Organ / stage
reproductive stage of developmente0
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
at least 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reproductive stage of development is the most sensitive to water deficit in cowpea, causing a reduction in water-use efficiencies and seed yields of at least 50% in all three genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes recovered better from vegetative-stage stress.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Outcome
ability to recover from stresse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes showed a better ability to recover from stress at vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield reduction was associated with fewer harvested pods per plant.

Organ / stage
harvested pods per plante0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in seed yield was associated with reductions in number of harvested pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and seed size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1485 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield reduction was associated with fewer seeds per pod.

Organ / stage
seeds per pode0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in seed yield was associated with reductions in number of harvested pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and seed size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1485 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield reduction was associated with smaller seed size.

Organ / stage
seed sizee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in seed yield was associated with reductions in number of harvested pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and seed size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly.

Outcome
Differences between the genotypese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between the genotypes were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The introduced cultivar had better yield than local types.

Material
introduced cultivare0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
local typese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the introduced cultivar had better yield and higher water-use efficiency compared to the local types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1658 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The introduced cultivar had higher water-use efficiency than local types.

Material
introduced cultivare0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
local typese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the introduced cultivar had better yield and higher water-use efficiency compared to the local types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1658 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify pod and seed number as important for stable high yield under water deficit.

Outcome
maximizing the number of pods and seedse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“maximizing the number of pods and seeds are among the most important traits for maintaining stable and high seed yields under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1931 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

27 papers: 8 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.