Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Tolerance of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Genotypes to Drought Stress During Vegetative and Reproductive Stages

Sujan Poudel; Lekshmy V. Sankarapillai; Bikash Adhikari; et al.

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cowpea is a valuable legume known for its high‐quality protein and multiple uses, but it often suffers from sub‐optimal moisture during different growth stages. While the effects of drought at certain stages are studied, comprehensive studies across all growth stages are limited. This study evaluated drought tolerance of two cowpea genotypes by examining morphophysiological, pigments, biomass, yield and quality traits under contrasting soil moisture conditions: control and drought during critical vegetative (V2 and V4) and reproductive (R1 and R4) stages. Gas exchange traits were more affected by drought during the vegetative stages than the reproductive stage, with photosynthesis declining by 86% at the vegetative stage, compared to a 68% reduction at the reproductive stage. The chlorophyll index declined by 54% in the R4 stage, while the V2 stage showed no significant changes under drought. Drought at the R1 stage led to a substantial decrease in seed yield by 46%, followed by 35% in R4, 33% in V2 and 27% in V4. The yield reduction at R1 correlated with an 82%, 68% and 44% drop in stomatal conductance, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll index, respectively, followed by a 3.4°C increase in leaf temperature. Drought stress during reproductive stages led to an increase in hundred‐seed weight and seed protein, while starch content decreased, indicating a shift in resource allocation under stress conditions. Based on seed number and weight, the order of cowpea growth stage resilience to drought stress followed the order of R1 < R4 < V2 < V4. These findings suggest that breeding for a multi‐stage drought‐resilient genotype is needed to sustain yield under rainfed conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought affected gas exchange more at vegetative than reproductive stages.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Gas exchange traitse0
Direction
more affectede0
Comparator
reproductive stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gas exchange traits were more affected by drought during the vegetative stages than the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis fell 86% under drought at the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
declininge0
Value
86%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthesis declining by 86% at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis fell 68% under drought at the reproductive stage.

Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 68% reduction at the reproductive stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index declined 54% at R4.

Organ / stage
R4 stagee0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
declinede0
Value
54%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll index declined by 54% in the R4 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index showed no significant change under drought at V2.

Organ / stage
V2 stagee0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
changese0
Direction
no significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the V2 stage showed no significant changes under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at R1 reduced seed yield 46%.

Organ / stage
R1 stagee0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought at the R1 stage led to a substantial decrease in seed yield by 46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced seed yield 35% at R4.

Organ / stage
R4e0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 35% in R4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced seed yield 33% at V2.

Organ / stage
V2e0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“33% in V2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced seed yield 27% at V4.

Organ / stage
V4e0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“27% in V4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R1, yield reduction correlated with an 82% drop in stomatal conductance.

Organ / stage
R1e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
drope0
Value
82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction at R1 correlated with an 82%, 68% and 44% drop in stomatal conductance, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll index, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R1, yield reduction correlated with a 68% drop in photosynthesis rate.

Organ / stage
R1e0
Outcome
photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
drope0
Value
68%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction at R1 correlated with an 82%, 68% and 44% drop in stomatal conductance, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll index, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R1, yield reduction correlated with a 44% drop in chlorophyll index.

Organ / stage
R1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
drope0
Value
44%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield reduction at R1 correlated with an 82%, 68% and 44% drop in stomatal conductance, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll index, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At R1, yield reduction was followed by a 3.4°C increase in leaf temperature.

Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.4°Ce0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by a 3.4°C increase in leaf temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive stage drought increased hundred seed weight and seed protein.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
hundred‐seed weight and seed proteine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress during reproductive stages led to an increase in hundred‐seed weight and seed protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive stage drought decreased starch content.

Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while starch content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea resilience ranked R1 below R4 below V2 below V4.

Outcome
R1 < R4 < V2 < V4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the order of cowpea growth stage resilience to drought stress followed the order of R1 < R4 < V2 < V4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1573 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend breeding for multi stage drought resilience to sustain rainfed yield.

Outcome
breeding for a multi‐stage drought‐resilient genotypee0
Qualifier
under rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“breeding for a multi‐stage drought‐resilient genotype is needed to sustain yield under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.