Paper · 2018 · American Journal of Climate Change

The Effect of Different Irrigation Levels in Cowpea Production in the Mid-Northern Region of Tocantins—Brazil

Francisco Maurício Alves Francelino; Fábio Cunha Coelho; Carmen Maria Coimbra Manhães; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the application of irrigation levels in the productivity and water use efficiency, in the soil and climatic conditions of the municipality of Colinas do Tocantins, located in the Mid-Northern region of the State of Tocantins. The cowpea cultivation system was submitted to the application of five irrigation blades, based on ET0—Reference Evapotranspiration: Blade 0% of ET0, Blade 50% of ET0, Blade 75% of ET0, Blade 100% of ET0 and Blade 125% of ET0 (B0, B50, B75, B100 and B125% of ET0). The descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, applying the 95% confidence interval to discriminate the differences between the treatments, since the replicates were constituted of 100 plants harvested at random within the plot for each treatment and no design method was performed. A significant effect of the different levels was found on all evaluated components, with the exception of the length of the pod, which did not differ in the irrigation levels. The increase in irrigation contributed to the increase of the results of the components that compete directly for higher productivity, such as number of pods per plant, weight of pods and number of seeds per pod. In these results, it was found that higher irrigation levels confer higher yields. Water-use efficiency—WUE behaved as per productivity trend, that is, it decreased with the reduction of irrigation levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased irrigation increased the number of pods per plant, pod weight and number of seeds per pod in cowpea.

Treatment
increase in irrigatione4
Outcome
number of pods per plant, weight of pods and number of seeds per pode4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cowpea cultivation system was submitted to the application of five irrigation blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 · show in text ↑
e2

“A significant effect of the different levels was found on all evaluated components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–926 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increase in irrigation contributed to the increase of the results of the components that compete directly for higher productivity, such as number of pods per plant, weight of pods and number of seeds per pod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod length did not differ among the irrigation levels in cowpea.

Treatment
irrigation levelse5
Outcome
length of the pode5
Direction
did not differe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cowpea cultivation system was submitted to the application of five irrigation blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 · show in text ↑
e5

“with the exception of the length of the pod, which did not differ in the irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency of cowpea decreased with reduction of irrigation levels.

Treatment
reduction of irrigation levelse6
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cowpea cultivation system was submitted to the application of five irrigation blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 · show in text ↑
e6

“Water-use efficiency—WUE behaved as per productivity trend, that is, it decreased with the reduction of irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation levels conferred higher cowpea yields.

Treatment
higher irrigation levelse3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The cowpea cultivation system was submitted to the application of five irrigation blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 · show in text ↑
e3

“In these results, it was found that higher irrigation levels confer higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1314 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.