Abstract
Abstract The experiment of intercropping cultivation of cassava and cutcherry plants to harvest the leaves that was fertilized organically. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of organic fertilizer on the total leaf yield of each plant, the efficiency of the land area and the efficiency of the time span of its cultivation. The experiment was carried out at the Practical Garden, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Wedomartani, Yogyakarta 55584 from September 2020 to January 2021, altitude 110 m above sea level, soil type Regosol. The research method was divided plot design with two treatments and repeated three times. The main plots consisted of organic fertilization with manure at a dose of 30 t/ha (P1), 40 t/ha (P2) and 50 t/ha (P3). The sub-plots were intercropped with a composition of (25% cassava + 100% cutcherry )/S1; (50% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/S2; (75% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/S3; (100% cassava + 0% cutcherry)/S0; and (0% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/K0. Observational data then calculated by analysis of variance.. The results showed that the dose of manure had no significant effect, but the intercropping pattern had a significant effect on leaf production. The highest yield of cassava leaves was in the intercropping pattern S3, although it was not significantly different from the intercropping pattern S2, while the yield of cutcherry leaves was almost the same in all intercropping patterns. The best intercropping pattern is the composition of (75% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/S3.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Manure dose had no significant effect on leaf production.
- Taxon
- cassava leaves and cutcherry leavest0
- Treatment
- dose of manuree0
- Outcome
- leaf productione0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the dose of manure had no significant effect, but the intercropping pattern had a significant effect on leaf production”
t0“cassava leaves and cutcherry leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping pattern significantly affected leaf production.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“the intercropping pattern had a significant effect on leaf production”
t0“cassava leaves and cutcherry leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Cassava leaf yield was highest under pattern S3, without a significant difference from S2.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- intercropping pattern S3e0
- Outcome
- yield of cassava leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- intercropping pattern S2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of cassava leaves was in the intercropping pattern S3, although it was not significantly different from the intercropping pattern S2”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutcherry leaf yield was almost the same across intercropping patterns.
- Taxon
- cutcherrye0
- Treatment
- intercropping patternse0
- Outcome
- yield of cutcherry leavese0
- Direction
- almost the samee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the yield of cutcherry leaves was almost the same in all intercropping patterns”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identify S3 composition as the best intercropping pattern.
- Taxon
- cassavaManihot esculentae0
- Outcome
- composition of (75% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/S3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best intercropping pattern is the composition of (75% cassava + 100% cutcherry)/S3”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.