Paper · 2022 · Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Different Type Light and Growing Medium on the Growth and Flowering of Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)

Layla S. M. Al-Mizory; Yousif H. Hammo

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was carried out in the greenhouse of the Horticulture Department Nursery, College of Agriculture Engineering Sciences, Duhok University, Kurdistan region, Iraq, for the period from 1st Aug 2020 to 1st Mar 2021, to study the effect of five supplemental light (control, natural light, Incandescent 14, Incandescent 18, mixed 14, mixed 18) hours daily and three growing medium (river soil, river soil + 30% local compost, river soil + 60% local compost) on some vegetative growth and flowering of two cultivars of carnation plant. The best results (fewest days) for the number of days from planting to bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesis were obtained when the plants were exposed to mixed light colours or incandescent lamps for a 14-hour treatment, Also this treatments were significantly superior in the other characteristics like plant height, flower length and flower diameter compared to the control. Medium with 60% local compost significantly increased all the studied characteristics compared with other mediums. The Ormea (Red) cultivar was significantly superior to the Moonlight cultivar in all studies of characteristics and was early in day numbers for bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesis. All second interactions between the investigated factors had a significant influence in all studied characteristics. In addition, the triple interaction between the three factors had a significant impact on all characteristics, including the least days or fewest days to flower anthesis of the Ormea cultivar when planted on medium containing 60% local compost under incandescent 14h, which took 101.80 days compared 176.27 days, with an early reach of 74.47 days for the control. The Moonlight (white) cultivar required the fewest days, 128.93 days, for a medium containing 60% compost under mixed 14h, which needed 123.93 days, compared to the control, which required 195.87 days with an early flowering rate of 71.94 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed light colours or incandescent lamps for a 14-hour treatment gave the fewest days from planting to bud emergence, visible flower colour and anthesis in carnation.

Treatment
mixed light colours or incandescent lamps for a 14-hour treatmente1
Outcome
number of days from planting to bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesise1
Direction
fewest dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best results (fewest days) for the number of days from planting to bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesis were obtained when the plants were exposed to mixed light colours or incandescent lamps for a 14-hour treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed light colours or incandescent lamps were significantly superior to the control in plant height, flower length and flower diameter of carnation.

Treatment
mixed light colours or incandescent lampse1
Outcome
plant height, flower length and flower diametere2
Direction
significantly superiore2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“The best results (fewest days) for the number of days from planting to bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesis were obtained when the plants were exposed to mixed light colours or incandescent lamps for a 14-hour treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–772 · show in text ↑
e2

“this treatments were significantly superior in the other characteristics like plant height, flower length and flower diameter compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 60% local compost significantly increased all the studied characteristics of carnation compared with other mediums.

Treatment
Medium with 60% local composte3
Outcome
all the studied characteristicse3
Direction
significantly increasede3
Comparator
other mediumse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Medium with 60% local compost significantly increased all the studied characteristics compared with other mediums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1043 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ormea (Red) cultivar was significantly superior to the Moonlight cultivar in all studied characteristics.

Material
Ormea (Red) cultivare4
Outcome
all studies of characteristicse4
Direction
significantly superiore4
Comparator
Moonlight cultivare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Ormea (Red) cultivar was significantly superior to the Moonlight cultivar in all studies of characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1156 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ormea (Red) cultivar was early for bud emergence, visible flower colour and anthesis.

Material
Ormea (Red) cultivare4
Outcome
day numbers for bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesise5
Direction
earlye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Ormea (Red) cultivar was significantly superior to the Moonlight cultivar in all studies of characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1156 · show in text ↑
e5

“was early in day numbers for bud emergence, visible flower colour, and anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Moonlight cultivar required the fewest days, 128.93 days, on medium with 60% compost under mixed 14-hour light, compared with 195.87 days for the control.

Material
Moonlight (white) cultivare6
Treatment
medium containing 60% compost under mixed 14he6
Outcome
dayse6
Direction
fewest dayse6
Value
128.93 dayse6
Qualifier
195.87 dayse6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Moonlight (white) cultivar required the fewest days, 128.93 days, for a medium containing 60% compost under mixed 14h, which needed 123.93 days, compared to the control, which required 195.87 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ormea cultivar reached flower anthesis in the fewest days, 101.80 days, on medium with 60% local compost under incandescent 14-hour light.

Material
Ormea cultivare7
Treatment
medium containing 60% local compost under incandescent 14he7
Outcome
days to flower anthesise7
Direction
fewest dayse7
Value
101.80 dayse7
Qualifier
176.27 dayse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e7

“the least days or fewest days to flower anthesis of the Ormea cultivar when planted on medium containing 60% local compost under incandescent 14h, which took 101.80 days compared 176.27 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1670 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The second-order interactions between the investigated factors had a significant influence on all studied characteristics.

Treatment
second interactions between the investigated factorse0
Outcome
all studied characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“All second interactions between the investigated factors had a significant influence in all studied characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1357 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The triple interaction between the three factors had a significant impact on all characteristics of carnation.

Treatment
triple interaction between the three factorse0
Outcome
all characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Two Cultivars of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“the triple interaction between the three factors had a significant impact on all characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1468 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.