Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Photoperiod had no appreciable effect on dry-weight growth or leaf initiation rate.

A claim from Effects of Environment on Flower Initiation in Carnation · 1962

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod had no appreciable effect on dry-weight growth or leaf initiation rate.

Material
White Sime1
Treatment
Photoperiode0
Outcome
growth in terms of dry weight or on rates of leaf initiatione0
Direction
no appreciable effecte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carnation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56
e1

“variety White Sim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–211
e2

“Low light intensities delayed flower initiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–260
e0

“Photoperiod, however, had no appreciable effect on growth in terms of dry weight or on rates of leaf initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–641

Title

Effects of Environment on Flower Initiation in Carnation

G. P. Harris; Juliet E. Harris Journal of Horticultural Science 1962. doi:10.1080/00221589.1962.11514041

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-1b31387b05c8d5a4a71ccd7d640eb19eb6d401a107ee5439403855b4ac33680e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.