Paper · 2018 · Flower Research Journal

Sucrose Concentration, Light Intensity, and CO2 Concentration Affect Growth and Development of Micropropagated Carnation

Ji Eun Park; Luc The Thi; Liu Ya; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) ‘Purple Beauty’ at micropropagation stage 3 was cultured under two levels each of medium sucrose concentration (0 and 30 g·L-1), photosynthetic photon flux density (50 and 200 μmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD), and CO2 concentration (350 and 1,000 μmol·mol-1), in a factorial experimental design, consisting of all eight possible treatment combinations. Shoot tip explants, obtained from in vitro-grown plantlets, were cultured on 50 mL agar-solidified Murashige and Skoog medium per container. Each culture container was sealed with a rigid lid vented by a high-efficiency particulate air filter attached to a 10 mm diameter hole made in the lid center, with an estimated number of 2.8 air exchanges per hour. All cultures were maintained for four weeks at 24°C/22°C (day/night) temperatures, 70%–80% relative humidity, and a 16 h/8 h (day/night) photoperiod was provided by white light-emitting diodes. The treatment combining high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrose to the medium (i.e., photo-autotrophic conditions) resulted in better plantlet growth and development, with higher values being observed in terms of total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf length, leaf width, and total chlorophyll content than in plantlets grown under the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light and CO2 without sucrose increased carnation plantlet fresh weight, tissue water content and leaf length relative to other treatments.

Material
‘Purple Beauty’e0
Treatment
high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrosee1
Outcome
total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf lengthe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
plantlets grown under the other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) ‘Purple Beauty’ at micropropagation stage 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combining high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrose to the medium (i.e., photo-autotrophic conditions) resulted in better plantlet growth and development, with higher values being observed in terms of total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf length, leaf width, and total chlorophyll content than in plantlets grown under the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased carnation plantlet leaf width and total chlorophyll content relative to other treatments.

Material
‘Purple Beauty’e0
Treatment
high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrosee1
Outcome
leaf width, and total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
plantlets grown under the other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) ‘Purple Beauty’ at micropropagation stage 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combining high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrose to the medium (i.e., photo-autotrophic conditions) resulted in better plantlet growth and development, with higher values being observed in terms of total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf length, leaf width, and total chlorophyll content than in plantlets grown under the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1371 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sucrose · physiology: pigments · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

co2 · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.