Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High light and CO2 without sucrose increased carnation plantlet fresh weight, tissue water content and leaf length relative to other treatments.

A claim from Sucrose Concentration, Light Intensity, and CO2 Concentration Affect Growth and Development of Micropropagated Carnation · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light and CO2 without sucrose increased carnation plantlet fresh weight, tissue water content and leaf length relative to other treatments.

Material
‘Purple Beauty’e0
Treatment
high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrosee1
Outcome
total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf lengthe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
plantlets grown under the other treatmentse1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dianthus caryophyllus
Dianthus caryophyllus · TaxonDarkone ( talk · contribs ) · CC BY-SA 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) ‘Purple Beauty’ at micropropagation stage 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80
e1

“The treatment combining high light intensity (200 μmol·m-2·s-1), high CO2 concentration (1,000 μmol·mol-1), and without supplementation of sucrose to the medium (i.e., photo-autotrophic conditions) resulted in better plantlet growth and development, with higher values being observed in terms of total fresh weight, tissue water content, leaf length, leaf width, and total chlorophyll content than in plantlets grown under the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1371

Title

Sucrose Concentration, Light Intensity, and CO2 Concentration Affect Growth and Development of Micropropagated Carnation

Ji Eun Park; Luc The Thi; Liu Ya; et al. Flower Research Journal 2018. doi:10.11623/frj.2018.26.2.04

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-e8cadfd7e5c3c49e34261813157636e0a6ea0789224f674522d0c3d39cec550b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sucrose · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

light · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

co2 · growth · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.