Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Nutrient Content, Uptake and Yield of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana l.) Influenced by Phosphorus Management Practices

P. Kejiya; B. Vajantha; M. V. S. Nayudu; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out at Agricultural Research Station, Perumalapalle, Tirupati, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University during kharif season of 2018 on sandy loam soil to study the response phosphorus fertilizer, PSB and VAM on yield and nutrient content and uptake of fingermillet. The experiment used a Randomized Block design with nine treatments and was reproduced three times. Among the phosphorus management practices, application of RDF + PSB @ 750 ml ha-1 + VAM@ 12.5 kg ha-1 (T9) showed its best results with respect to nutrient content and uptake at flowering and harvesting stage as compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with PSB and VAM was best for nutrient content and uptake at flowering and harvest.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
flowering and harvesting stagee0
Treatment
RDF + PSB @ 750 ml ha-1 + VAM@ 12.5 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakee0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of RDF + PSB @ 750 ml ha-1 + VAM@ 12.5 kg ha-1 (T9) showed its best results with respect to nutrient content and uptake at flowering and harvesting stage as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“fingermillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–295 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.