Abstract
A field experiment entitled “Performance of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.) under integrated nutrient management practices” was conducted at Agronomical research farm of Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi during Kharif 2016 to study the effect of integrated nutrient management practices on nutrient uptake, yield of finger millet and post-harvest availability of nutrients in soil. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with 10 treatments replicated thrice. The soil of experimental site was low in available nitrogen (232.47 Kg/ha), medium in phosphorus (14.30 Kg/ha) and potassium (131.84 Kg/ha). Result reveled that total uptake of NPK by the crop was higher with application FYM (10t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100% RDF and was followed by application of FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense+ Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 75% RDF. Available nitrogen, phosphorus were found highest with application of FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizer + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100 % RDF whereas available potassium was found non-significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Finger millet NPK uptake was highest under the full integrated nutrient treatment.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae1 - Treatment
- FYM (10t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- total uptake of NPK by the crope0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total uptake of NPK by the crop was higher with application FYM (10t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense + Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100% RDF”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF integrated treatment ranked second for NPK uptake.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense+ Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 75% RDFe0
- Outcome
- total uptake of NPK by the crope2
- Direction
- followed bye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was followed by application of FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizers (Azospirillum brasilense+ Bacillus spp. + Psuedomonas flurosence @ 20 g/kg seed each) + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 75% RDF”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.)”
e2“total uptake of NPK by the crop was higher”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest available nitrogen and phosphorus were highest with the 100% RDF integrated treatment.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizer + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100 % RDFe0
- Outcome
- Available nitrogen, phosphoruse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Available nitrogen, phosphorus were found highest with application of FYM (10 t/ha) + Biofertilizer + ZnSO4 (12.5 kg/ha) + Borax (5kg/ha) + 100 % RDF”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Available potassium did not differ significantly among treatments.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae1
- Treatment
- 10 treatmentse2
- Outcome
- available potassiume0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“available potassium was found non-significant”
e1“finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.)”
e2“10 treatments replicated thrice”
The same questions in other papers
borax · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
zinc sulfate · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
borax · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.