Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofertilization strongly increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by finger millet and pigeon pea under both well-watered and drought conditions.

A claim from Finger Millet Growth and Nutrient Uptake Is Improved in Intercropping With Pigeon Pea Through “Biofertilization” and “Bioirrigation” Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilization strongly increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by finger millet and pigeon pea under both well-watered and drought conditions.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Biofertilizatione3
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee3
Direction
strongly increasede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whether finger millet, a shallow-rooted cereal, can profit from neighboring pigeon pea, a deep-rooted legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–203
e3

“Biofertilization strongly increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by both plants, both under well-watered and drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1104

Title

Finger Millet Growth and Nutrient Uptake Is Improved in Intercropping With Pigeon Pea Through “Biofertilization” and “Bioirrigation” Mediated by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria

Krishna Saharan; Lukas Schütz; Ansgar Kahmen; et al. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2018.00046

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-9192a6fed4635ed39378df907c3d31a8158efe966741afd5a79a1740b4708fc7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.