Paper · 2022 · Khulna University Studies

EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER PLACEMENT ON EMERGENCE AND EARLY GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Md. Enamul Kabir; Chris Johansen; Richard W. Bell

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Fertilizer in close proximity to seed can hamper emergence and early growth of seedlings. This study investigates whether phosphorus fertilizer placement with or close to seed affects emergence and early growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its relationship to soil texture. In pot culture studies with sandy soil, emergence and early growth were suppressed when triple superphosphate (TSP) and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) were in contact with seed or banded 2cm directly below the seed; the effect of DAP was more detrimental than that of TSP. Placement of TSP at 5 cm directly below the seed did not hamper emergence in sandy soil although it still had a mild suppressive effect on early growth of chickpea. In clay soil, the recommended rate of TSP (100 kg TSP or 20 kg P ha- ) had little or no effect on emergence and negligible effect on subsequent seedling growth. In fields with clay loam soil, placement of the recommended rate of TSP with chickpea seeds in rows by a minimum-till planter was also found safe. In conclusion, the effect of phosphorus fertilizer placement in close proximity to chickpea seed was soil texture specific: in sandy soil the placement had deleterious effect on emergence and early growth while in clay soil there was little or no effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-contact or 2 cm sub-seed TSP suppressed chickpea emergence and early growth in sandy soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
triple superphosphate (TSP)e0
Outcome
emergence and early growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Setting
sandy soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pot culture studies with sandy soil, emergence and early growth were suppressed when triple superphosphate (TSP) and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) were in contact with seed or banded 2cm directly below the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-contact or 2 cm sub-seed DAP suppressed chickpea emergence and early growth in sandy soil.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
di-ammonium phosphate (DAP)e0
Outcome
emergence and early growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Setting
sandy soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pot culture studies with sandy soil, emergence and early growth were suppressed when triple superphosphate (TSP) and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) were in contact with seed or banded 2cm directly below the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DAP was more detrimental to chickpea than TSP.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
DAPe0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
more detrimentale0
Comparator
TSPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of DAP was more detrimental than that of TSP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP placed 5 cm below seed mildly suppressed early chickpea growth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
TSP at 5 cm directly below the seede1
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
suppressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it still had a mild suppressive effect on early growth of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–715 · show in text ↑
e1

“Placement of TSP at 5 cm directly below the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended-rate TSP with chickpea seed was safe in clay-loam fields.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
recommended rate of TSP with chickpea seeds in rowse0
Outcome
safee0
Direction
safee0
Setting
fields with clay loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In fields with clay loam soil, placement of the recommended rate of TSP with chickpea seeds in rows by a minimum-till planter was also found safe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1024 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.