Paper · 1975 · HortScience

Weed Control in a Fruit Tree Nursery with Herbicide-Impregnated String1

A. S. Hamill; R. E. C. Layne; F. G. von Stryk

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract String impregnated with simazine, atrazine, and diuron (6.6%, 2.2%, and 2.2% by weight) controlled weeds in rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock. A single strand of herbicide-impregnated string controlled all weed growth in a band 30.5 cm wide when placed at the base of the seedlings on the surface of a Fox sandy loam soil. Complete weed control was obtained from the fall of 1973 to the fall of 1974. Placement of the string at various heights above the soil surface gave less satisfactory weed control than surface placement, permitted less release of herbicide and caused injury to young leaves which came in constant contact with the string. A wheat bioassay of the nursery soil after seedling removal indicated no phytotoxic residues. Chemical analysis of the string at the end of the experiment showed that 88% of the herbicide was released when one strand of string was placed on the soil surface. This resulted in a concentration of 4.05, 1.35 and 1.35 kg/ha of simazine, atrazine and diuron, respectively, in the treated area. No phytotoxicity from the soil surface string placement was observed on peach or apricot nursery trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single strand of herbicide-impregnated string controlled all weed growth in a 30.5 cm band on a Fox sandy loam soil.

Treatment
A single strand of herbicide-impregnated stringe2
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed growthe2
Direction
controllede2
Value
30.5 cme2
Setting
Fox sandy loam soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“controlled weeds in rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–226 · show in text ↑
e2

“A single strand of herbicide-impregnated string controlled all weed growth in a band 30.5 cm wide when placed at the base of the seedlings on the surface of a Fox sandy loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete weed control was obtained from autumn 1973 to autumn 1974 in peach and apricot nursery rows.

Outcome
Complete weed controle3
Qualifier
from the fall of 1973 to the fall of 1974e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“Complete weed control was obtained from the fall of 1973 to the fall of 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placing the string at various heights above the soil surface gave less satisfactory weed control than surface placement.

Treatment
Placement of the string at various heights above the soil surfacee4
Outcome
weed controle4
Direction
less satisfactorye4
Comparator
surface placemente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“Placement of the string at various heights above the soil surface gave less satisfactory weed control than surface placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placing the string at various heights caused injury to young leaves and permitted less herbicide release.

Treatment
Placement of the string at various heights above the soil surfacee4
Outcome
injury to young leavese5
Direction
causede5
Comparator
surface placemente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e4

“Placement of the string at various heights above the soil surface gave less satisfactory weed control than surface placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–610 · show in text ↑
e5

“caused injury to young leaves which came in constant contact with the string”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–728 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 88% of the herbicide was released when one strand of string was placed on the soil surface.

Treatment
one strand of string was placed on the soil surfacee6
Outcome
herbicide was releasede6
Value
88%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e6

“88% of the herbicide was released when one strand of string was placed on the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The string placement gave a concentration of 4.05, 1.35 and 1.35 kg/ha of simazine, atrazine and diuron in the treated area.

Outcome
concentratione7
Value
4.05, 1.35 and 1.35 kg/hae7
Qualifier
simazine, atrazine and diurone7
Setting
treated areae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e7

“This resulted in a concentration of 4.05, 1.35 and 1.35 kg/ha of simazine, atrazine and diuron, respectively, in the treated area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat bioassay of nursery soil after seedling removal indicated no phytotoxic residues.

Outcome
phytotoxic residuese7
Qualifier
wheat bioassaye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rows of 8 month-old peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and apricot ( P. armeniaca L.) seedling nursery stock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–226 · show in text ↑
e7

“A wheat bioassay of the nursery soil after seedling removal indicated no phytotoxic residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No phytotoxicity from soil surface string placement was observed on peach or apricot nursery trees.

Treatment
soil surface string placemente7
Outcome
phytotoxicitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“No phytotoxicity from the soil surface string placement was observed on peach or apricot nursery trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1222 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.