Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at Sids agricultural Research Station to study the response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour to some bio-nitrogen fertilization treatments, i.e. control, inoculation with Rhizobacterien, "- inoculation with Rhizobacterien plus 10 kg NI fed, inoculation with Rhizobacterien plus 20 kg NI fed and 30 kg NI fed under three hill spaces ( 20, 25 and 30 cm between hills) and their effects on some growth characters, yield and yield components as well as oil content and oil yield per fed. Results showed that, cultivars significantly differed in all characters under study. It was clear that Eroflour cultivar surpassed the other two varieties in most studied parameters, except plant height (cm) and 100- seed weight (gm) where Maik cultivar gave the tallest sunflower plant, while 100- seed weight (gm) was not affected by cultivars. Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills) led to a significant increase in plant height and both seeds and oil yields per fed, while both stem and head diameter, 100- seed weight and seeds weight per head had a reverse trend. Oil content was not affected by plant density. As for bio- nitrogen fertilization, all studied characters significantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels up to 30 kg NI fed. Inoculation of sunflower seeds with Rhizobacterien plus application of 20 kg NI fed gave seeds yield per fed. equal to that of fertilization with 30 kg NI fed, where no significance differences between them. In general, the interactions among the three studied cultivars was significant on all traits studied herein. It could be concluded that using Eroflour cultivar under 20 cm between hills. Also, seed inoculate the seed with Rhizobacteries as bio-fertilizer plus 20 kg NI fed produced the highest seeds and oil yieldsl fed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
The three sunflower cultivars significantly differed in all characters under study.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuuse0 - Outcome
- all characters under studye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e1“cultivars significantly differed in all characters under study”
Claim · model-written summary
Eroflour surpassed the other two cultivars in most studied parameters of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Material
- Erofloure2
- Outcome
- most studied parameterse2
- Direction
- surpassede2
- Comparator
- the other two varietiese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e2“Eroflour cultivar surpassed the other two varieties in most studied parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Maik was the tallest sunflower cultivar, although plant height was the exception to the Eroflour advantage.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Material
- Maike3
- Outcome
- plant heighte3
- Direction
- talleste3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e3“plant height (cm) and 100- seed weight (gm) where Maik cultivar gave the tallest sunflower plant”
Claim · model-written summary
100-seed weight of sunflower was not affected by cultivars.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- cultivarse4
- Outcome
- 100- seed weight (gm)e4
- Direction
- not affectede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e4“100- seed weight (gm) was not affected by cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing plant distance to 20 cm between hills significantly increased plant height of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills)e5
- Outcome
- plant heighte5
- Direction
- increasee5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e5“Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills) led to a significant increase in plant height and both seeds and oil yields per fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing plant distance to 20 cm between hills increased seed and oil yields per feddan of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills)e5
- Outcome
- seeds and oil yields per fede5
- Direction
- increasee5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e5“Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills) led to a significant increase in plant height and both seeds and oil yields per fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing plant distance to 20 cm between hills had a reverse trend on stem and head diameter of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills)e5
- Outcome
- stem and head diametere6
- Direction
- reverse trende6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e5“Decrease the plant distances (20 cm between hills) led to a significant increase in plant height and both seeds and oil yields per fed”
e6“both stem and head diameter, 100- seed weight and seeds weight per head had a reverse trend”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil content of sunflower was not affected by plant density.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- plant densitye7
- Outcome
- Oil contente7
- Direction
- not affectede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e7“Oil content was not affected by plant density”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen levels up to 30 kg NI fed significantly increased all studied characters of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- increasing nitrogen levels up to 30 kg NI fede1
- Outcome
- all studied characterse1
- Direction
- significantly increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e1“all studied characters significantly increased by increasing nitrogen levels up to 30 kg NI fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower seed inoculation with Rhizobacterien plus 20 kg NI fed gave seed yield per feddan equal to fertilization with 30 kg NI fed.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
- Treatment
- Inoculation of sunflower seeds with Rhizobacterien plus application of 20 kg NI fede2
- Interactor
- Rhizobacteriene2symbiont
- Outcome
- seeds yield per fede2
- Direction
- equal toe2
- Comparator
- fertilization with 30 kg NI fede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e2“Inoculation of sunflower seeds with Rhizobacterien plus application of 20 kg NI fed gave seeds yield per fed. equal to that of fertilization with 30 kg NI fed, where no significance differences between them”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction among the three sunflower cultivars was significant for all traits studied.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Material
- the three studied cultivarse1
- Outcome
- all traits studied hereine1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e1“the interactions among the three studied cultivars was significant on all traits studied herein”
Claim · model-written summary
Using Eroflour under 20 cm between hills is recommended for sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Outcome
- using Eroflour cultivar under 20 cm between hillse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e1“using Eroflour cultivar under 20 cm between hills”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Rhizobacteries as bio-fertilizer plus 20 kg NI fed produced the highest seed and oil yields of sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
- Treatment
- inoculate the seed with Rhizobacteries as bio-fertilizer plus 20 kg NI fede1
- Interactor
- Rhizobacteriese1symbiont
- Outcome
- seeds and oil yieldsl fede1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of three sunflower cultivars, namely Maik, Vedoc and Eroflour”
e1“seed inoculate the seed with Rhizobacteries as bio-fertilizer plus 20 kg NI fed produced the highest seeds and oil yieldsl fed”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →inoculation · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.