Abstract
Technologies that increase crop yields are possible when providing profitability to the producer. The objective of this study was to evaluate production costs and profitability of maize in production systems in Cerrado. The study was conducted in Selvíria (Mato Grosso do Sul State), Brazil, in the years 2009/10 and 2010/11. The experiment was arranged in randomized blocks with four replications in factorial and mixed with tracks. We established 36 treatments, three green manures (Pennisetum glaucum, Crotalaria juncea and intercropping Pennisetum glaucum + Crotalaria juncea), three soil management practices (no-tillage system, heavy disking + levelling disking and chisel plow + levelling disking) and four doses of N (0, 60, 90 and 120 kg ha-1). For economic analysis were estimated operational cost, the gross revenue obtained by the product of the productivity of the treatments and the value of corn (R$ 0,417 kg or R$ 25,00 sc-1) and the ratio revenue/cost of treatment. Whereas higher values (revenue/cost > 1) and lower (revenue/cost ratio < 1) as a parameter in the analysis of profitability, it can be concluded that corn under no-tillage had the highest profitability in succession to Pennisetum glaucum growing profitability with increasing N rates, in succession to Crotalaria juncea and in the absence of nitrogen application on the coverage achieved higher profitability compared to other treatments and in succession to the consortium Pennisetum glaucum + Crotalaria juncea doses of N was between 50 and 55 kg ha-1 offer greater profitability to the cultivation of corn.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage maize after Pennisetum glaucum had the highest profitability.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- no-tillagee0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- in succession to Pennisetum glaucume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn under no-tillage had the highest profitability in succession to Pennisetum glaucum”
Claim · model-written summary
Profitability after Pennisetum glaucum increased with nitrogen rates.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- increasing N ratese0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- growinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in succession to Pennisetum glaucum growing profitability with increasing N rates”
e1“corn under no-tillage had the highest profitability in succession to Pennisetum glaucum”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize after Crotalaria juncea without nitrogen application had higher profitability than other treatments.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
- Treatment
- in the absence of nitrogen applicatione0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in succession to Crotalaria junceae0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in succession to Crotalaria juncea and in the absence of nitrogen application on the coverage achieved higher profitability compared to other treatments”
e1“corn under no-tillage had the highest profitability in succession to Pennisetum glaucum”
Claim · model-written summary
After the Pennisetum glaucum and Crotalaria juncea mixture, nitrogen doses between 50 and 55 kg ha-1 gave greater maize profitability.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- doses of N was between 50 and 55 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- in succession to the consortium Pennisetum glaucum + Crotalaria junceae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in succession to the consortium Pennisetum glaucum + Crotalaria juncea doses of N was between 50 and 55 kg ha-1 offer greater profitability to the cultivation of corn”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.