Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Production

REGENERATION AND Agrobacierlum - MEDIATED TRANS- . FORMATION STUDIES IN FIG; Ficus carica L.

H. Ahemaidan,; Mahdia Gabr; Naglaa Abdallah

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A system for regeneration and Agrobacferium mediated transformation of the common figFr'cus caries L. of the cultivar Sultani was developed. Different combinations of BA and NAA or 2,4-D and kinetin of callus formation from leaf segment explants. and the best % formation of callus was found to be 2.0 mg/L 2,4-D and 0.2 mgfL kinetin. Callus produced somatic embryogenesis which differentiated to plantlets on media containing TDZ in combination with NAA or 2ip.The best concentrations which produce somatic embryogenesis and differentiated to plantlets on media were containingSO mgfl 2ip and 7 mg/L TDZ with 0.25 mg/L NAA, which gave the regeneration efficiencies 83 and 79 of respectively.The callus failed to induce organogenesis on media containing BA and kinetin. The best concentrations of growth regulators to produce shoots formation by direct somatic embryogenesis with leaf explants were on media containing 2 mg/L TDZ and 4 mg/L 2ip, which gave the regeneration efficiencies (89%).The best results of shoots forming roots was reached the highest value 95% by using MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/ L IBA. Leaf explants of in w'tro propagated plants were co-cultivation with Agrcbacferium cell culture containing the binary plasmid plSV267B which harbor the gus-intron and bar genes, the results showed that the highest transformation efficiency was obtained when explants incubated for 30 min. with bacterial suspension (17.5%). The transgenic nature of regenerated plants was confirmed by histochemical GUS, leaf painting assay and PCB analysis. Keywords: Fig (Ficus canoe); Transformation; Callus; Regeneration; GUS; bar, Agrobacterium fumefaciens

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf-segment callus formation of fig was best on 2.0 mg/L 2,4-D with 0.2 mg/L kinetin.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Organ / stage
leaf segment explantse2
Treatment
2.0 mg/L 2,4-D and 0.2 mgfL kinetine1
Outcome
best % formation of calluse1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
BA and NAAe2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“and the best % formation of callus was found to be 2.0 mg/L 2,4-D and 0.2 mgfL kinetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–333 · show in text ↑
e2

“Different combinations of BA and NAA or 2,4-D and kinetin of callus formation from leaf segment explants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fig callus failed to induce organogenesis on media containing BA and kinetin.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Organ / stage
calluse3
Treatment
media containing BA and kinetine3
Outcome
organogenesise3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The callus failed to induce organogenesis on media containing BA and kinetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus of fig produced somatic embryogenesis that differentiated to plantlets on media with TDZ combined with NAA or 2ip.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Organ / stage
Calluse4
Treatment
TDZ in combination with NAA or 2ipe4
Outcome
somatic embryogenesis which differentiated to plantletse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Callus produced somatic embryogenesis which differentiated to plantlets on media containing TDZ in combination with NAA or 2ip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best media with 2ip, TDZ and NAA gave regeneration efficiencies of 83 and 79.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Treatment
SO mgfl 2ip and 7 mg/L TDZ with 0.25 mg/L NAAe5
Outcome
regeneration efficienciese5
Value
83 and 79e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“The best concentrations which produce somatic embryogenesis and differentiated to plantlets on media were containingSO mgfl 2ip and 7 mg/L TDZ with 0.25 mg/L NAA, which gave the regeneration efficiencies 83 and 79 of respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants on 2 mg/L TDZ and 4 mg/L 2ip gave a regeneration efficiency of 89%.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Organ / stage
leaf explantse6
Treatment
2 mg/L TDZ and 4 mg/L 2ipe6
Outcome
regeneration efficienciese6
Value
89%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e6

“The best concentrations of growth regulators to produce shoots formation by direct somatic embryogenesis with leaf explants were on media containing 2 mg/L TDZ and 4 mg/L 2ip, which gave the regeneration efficiencies (89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots forming roots reached the highest value, 95%, on MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/L IBA.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Treatment
MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/ L IBAe7
Outcome
shoots forming rootse7
Direction
higheste7
Value
95%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“The best results of shoots forming roots was reached the highest value 95% by using MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/ L IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Explants incubated for 30 min with bacterial suspension gave the highest transformation efficiency, 17.5%.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Treatment
explants incubated for 30 mine7
Outcome
transformation efficiencye7
Direction
higheste7
Value
17.5%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“the results showed that the highest transformation efficiency was obtained when explants incubated for 30 min. with bacterial suspension (17.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1442 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regenerated fig plants were confirmed as transgenic by histochemical GUS, leaf painting and PCR-type analysis.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Outcome
transgenic nature of regenerated plantse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“The transgenic nature of regenerated plants was confirmed by histochemical GUS, leaf painting assay and PCB analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1560 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system was developed for fig cultivar Sultani.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Material
Sultanie7
Outcome
system for regeneration and Agrobacferium mediated transformatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92 · show in text ↑
e7

“A system for regeneration and Agrobacferium mediated transformation of the common figFr'cus caries L. of the cultivar Sultani was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

kinetin · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.