Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Compost Seed of Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102 in Controlling Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii

Wiyada Mongkolthanaruk

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Antagonistic fungus, Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102, exhibited 90% inhibition against Sclerotium rolfsii in vitro and 80% survival of tomatoes infected by S. rolfsii in vivo. Moreover, the antagonistic fungi increased the effectiveness of a commercial fungicide (vitavax) in controlling S. rolfsii in tomatoes. In field experiments, composts were used as carriers for T. harzianum UD12-102 inoculum preparation. Following S. rolfsii inoculation, the survival percentages of tomato plants were not significantly different with all treatments receiving T. harzianum UD12-102 antagonist. However, the inoculum prepared with compost B (inoculated the antagonist at beginning of composting) resulted in a high survival percentage (more than 60%) with 4 weeks of infection, while the survival percentage of control plants dramatically decreased on week 2 (8.35%), and the plants died after 3 weeks due to S. rolfsii. The compost was a good alternative carrier for antagonistic fungi inoculation and was friendly with soil environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102 inhibited Sclerotium rolfsii by 90% in vitro.

Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione0
Value
90%e0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Antagonistic fungus, Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102, exhibited 90% inhibition against Sclerotium rolfsii in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes infected with Sclerotium rolfsii had 80% survival in vivo with the antagonist.

Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survivale1
Value
80%e1
Setting
in vivoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Antagonistic fungus, Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102, exhibited 90% inhibition against Sclerotium rolfsii in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“80% survival of tomatoes infected by S. rolfsii in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonistic fungi increased the effectiveness of a commercial fungicide (vitavax) in controlling Sclerotium rolfsii on tomatoes.

Treatment
antagonistic fungie2
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie2pathogen
Outcome
effectivenesse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
a commercial fungicide (vitavax)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“the antagonistic fungi increased the effectiveness of a commercial fungicide (vitavax) in controlling S. rolfsii in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato survival percentages after Sclerotium rolfsii inoculation did not differ significantly among treatments receiving Trichoderma harzianum UD12-102.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume3
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie3pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianum UD12-102Trichoderma harzianume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survival percentagese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“Following S. rolfsii inoculation, the survival percentages of tomato plants were not significantly different with all treatments receiving T. harzianum UD12-102 antagonist”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculum prepared with compost B gave higher tomato survival than control plants after 4 weeks of infection.

Treatment
the inoculum prepared with compost Be4
Outcome
survival percentagee4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
more than 60%e4
Qualifier
with 4 weeks of infectione4
Comparator
control plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“the inoculum prepared with compost B (inoculated the antagonist at beginning of composting) resulted in a high survival percentage (more than 60%) with 4 weeks of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–766 · show in text ↑
e5

“the survival percentage of control plants dramatically decreased on week 2 (8.35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–856 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival percentage of control plants decreased to 8.35% in week 2.

Outcome
survival percentage of control plantse5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
8.35%e5
Qualifier
on week 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“the survival percentage of control plants dramatically decreased on week 2 (8.35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–856 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control tomato plants died after 3 weeks of Sclerotium rolfsii infection.

Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie6pathogen
Outcome
diede6
Qualifier
after 3 weekse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“the plants died after 3 weeks due to S. rolfsii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–909 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend compost as a good alternative carrier for antagonistic fungus inoculation.

Outcome
good alternative carrier for antagonistic fungi inoculatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Collar and Stem Rot of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“The compost was a good alternative carrier for antagonistic fungi inoculation and was friendly with soil environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1028 · show in text ↑

inoculation · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.