Paper · 2007 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Compost andGlomus mosseaefor Management of Bacterial and Fusarium Wilts of Tomato

L. B. Taiwo; D. T. Adebayo; O. S. Adebayo; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Bacterial and fungal wilts cause considerable yield loss in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentumMill.), and require sustainable control strategies to reduce their incidence. Tomato was inoculated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae(Nicolson & Gerdemann) Gerd. et Trappe, and treated with organic and inorganic fertilizers to determine effects on severity of tomato wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum(Smith) and Fusarium oxysporumSchlecht. f. sp. lycopersiciSacc. (Fol) in greenhouse and field studies. In the greenhouse, Folsignificantly increased wilt of control plants relative to compost-fertilized and G. mosseae-inoculated plants. No fruit was produced by inorganically fertilized plants inoculated with R. solanacearum, while few fruit were obtained from Fol-infected plants. In the field tomato plants fertilized with compost made from cassava peel waste and poultry droppings plus 60 kg NPK had the highest survival of over 55%, while only <17% of control plants which received no fertilizer survived. Tomato wilt severity was reduced slightly with G. mosseaerelative to the control. In the field, year and fertilizer significantly affected numbers of fruit. Compost alone significantly increased numbers of fruit and yield relative to controls. Application of an additional 60 kg·ha−1 of urea to compost significantly decreased survival of tomato in the field. Fertilizer treatment and mycorrhizal inoculation increased the vitamin C content of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation increased wilt in controls relative to compost fertilized plants.

Treatment
Fole0
Interactor
Fole0pathogen
Outcome
wilt of control plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
compost-fertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Folsignificantly increased wilt of control plants relative to compost-fertilized and G. mosseae-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation increased wilt in controls relative to G. mosseae inoculated plants.

Treatment
Fole0
Interactor
Fole0pathogen
Second interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
wilt of control plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
G. mosseae-inoculatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Folsignificantly increased wilt of control plants relative to compost-fertilized and G. mosseae-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganically fertilized tomato inoculated with R. solanacearum produced no fruit.

Treatment
inorganically fertilizede0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
No fruit was producede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No fruit was produced by inorganically fertilized plants inoculated with R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fol infected tomato plants produced few fruit.

Interactor
Fole0pathogen
Outcome
few fruit were obtainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“few fruit were obtained from Fol-infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus NPK produced over 55% tomato survival versus under 17% in unfertilized controls.

Treatment
compost made from cassava peel waste and poultry droppings plus 60 kg NPKe0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
higheste0
Value
over 55%e0
Qualifier
<17%e0
Comparator
control plants which received no fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato plants fertilized with compost made from cassava peel waste and poultry droppings plus 60 kg NPK had the highest survival of over 55%, while only <17% of control plants which received no fertilizer survived”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae slightly reduced tomato wilt severity.

Treatment
G. mosseaee0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
Tomato wilt severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato wilt severity was reduced slightly with G. mosseaerelative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year and fertilizer significantly affected field tomato fruit number.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
numbers of fruite0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“year and fertilizer significantly affected numbers of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost alone significantly increased field tomato fruit number and yield.

Treatment
Compost alonee0
Outcome
numbers of fruit and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost alone significantly increased numbers of fruit and yield relative to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 60 kg·ha−1 urea to compost reduced field tomato survival.

Treatment
an additional 60 kg·ha−1 of urea to composte0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of an additional 60 kg·ha−1 of urea to compost significantly decreased survival of tomato in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatment increased tomato vitamin C content.

Treatment
Fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer treatment and mycorrhizal inoculation increased the vitamin C content of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased tomato vitamin C content.

Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer treatment and mycorrhizal inoculation increased the vitamin C content of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1485 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

nitrogen · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.