Paper · 2022 · Legume Research - An International Journal

On-farm Evaluation of Leaf Colour Chart and Chlorophyll Meter for Need-based Nitrogen Management in Kharif Maize (Zea mays L.)

Arshdeep Singh; Shimpy Sarkar; Anita Jaswal; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Soil is important medium of all living beings. Due to the high doses of fertilizers application soil heath is getting deteriorated. Soil fertility variation restricts efficient fertilizer N management when broad based blanket recommendations are used in maize (Zea mays L.). Site-specific fertilizer nitrogen management (SSNM) could be the best management option to avoid excessive and untimely nitrogen (N) applications in maize. Methods: A field experiment was conducted at agronomy Farm, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara during kharif season of 2020 and 2021 to study the nitrogen management using leaf colour chart (LCC) and chlorophyll meter in maize (Zea mays L.). Colour (of the first top maize leaf with fully exposed collar) as measured by comparison with different shades of green colour on a leaf colour chart (LCC) and also by SPAD meter. Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1. Result: Evaluation of the established threshold leaf greenness revealed that fertilizer N management using LCC 5 and SPAD 50 starting from six-leaf stage to before silking stage resulted in improved agronomic efficiency in maize. There was no response to fertilizer N application at silking stage. The study concluded that in maize, fertilizer N can be more efficiently managed by applying fertilizer N dose based on leaf colour as measured by LCC than blanket recommendation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application improved maize growth traits over fixed-time nitrogen application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application improved maize stem, leaf and cob traits over fixed-time application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application improved maize cob dimensions and number over fixed-time application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1e0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application improved maize grain components over fixed-time application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application raised maize grain and stover yields over fixed-time application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
grain and stover yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen application improved maize grain protein content over fixed-time application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Need based fertilizer application at LCC5 and SPAD 50 significantly improved growth and yield attributes viz., plant height, dry matter accumulation plant-1, number of leaves plant-1, stem diameter, number of internodes plant-1, leaf area index, cob length, cob girth, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1, grain weight plant-1 and 1000-grain weight along with higher grain and stover yields, grain protein content over fixed time application of 1200 kg N ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCC 5 and SPAD 50 nitrogen management from six-leaf stage to before silking improved agronomic efficiency in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fertilizer N management using LCC 5 and SPAD 50e0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
starting from six-leaf stage to before silking stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer N management using LCC 5 and SPAD 50 starting from six-leaf stage to before silking stage resulted in improved agronomic efficiency in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize showed no response to fertilizer nitrogen applied at silking.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilizer N application at silking stagee0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no response to fertilizer N application at silking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend leaf-colour-based nitrogen dosing over blanket recommendation for more efficient maize nitrogen management.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
applying fertilizer N dose based on leaf colour as measured by LCCe0
Direction
more efficientlye0
Comparator
blanket recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in maize, fertilizer N can be more efficiently managed by applying fertilizer N dose based on leaf colour as measured by LCC than blanket recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1818 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.