Paper · 2022 · Agricultural and Food Science

Repeated runner removal after harvest and floating row cover during fall affect carbohydrate status and yield potential of strawberry cvs. Polka and Wendy in the Northern climate

Pauliina Palonen; Iiris Lettojärvi; Anu Koivisto; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We investigated the impact of repeated runner removal after harvest and row cover during fall on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cvs. Polka and Wendy cropping potential in the joint project of the University of Helsinki and the Rural Advisory Services Finland. Field trials were carried out in 2017 to 2019 on strawberry farms in Southern Ostrobothnia, Finland, at 62°49′N. The treatment effects on the crown carbohydrate reserves, flowering, and yield were recorded. Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harvest decreased the crown starch reserves but increased the length of the apical inflorescence initials as observed through flower mapping in November, and the numbers of inflorescences and flowers in cv. Polka. Floating row cover after flower induction in September to October hastened floral development in the fall and increased the numbers of inflorescences, flowers, and fruit in cv. Wendy. Although the effects may depend on a cultivar and weather conditions during fall, repeated removal of runners after harvest and covering plants with a floating row cover after flower induction are recommended to increase strawberry yield potential in the Northern climate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated runner removal decreased crown starch reserves.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harveste0
Outcome
crown starch reservese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harvest decreased the crown starch reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated runner removal increased apical inflorescence initial length in Polka.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
cv. Polkae0
Treatment
Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harveste0
Outcome
length of the apical inflorescence initialse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in Novembere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harvest decreased the crown starch reserves but increased the length of the apical inflorescence initials as observed through flower mapping in November, and the numbers of inflorescences and flowers in cv. Polka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated runner removal increased inflorescences and flowers in Polka.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
cv. Polkae0
Treatment
Runner removale1
Outcome
numbers of inflorescences and flowerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the length of the apical inflorescence initials as observed through flower mapping in November, and the numbers of inflorescences and flowers in cv. Polka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Runner removal three times in three-week intervals after harvest decreased the crown starch reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floating row cover hastened fall floral development in Wendy.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
cv. Wendye0
Treatment
Floating row cover after flower induction in September to Octobere0
Outcome
floral development in the falle0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Floating row cover after flower induction in September to October hastened floral development in the fall and increased the numbers of inflorescences, flowers, and fruit in cv. Wendy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floating row cover increased inflorescences, flowers and fruit in Wendy.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
cv. Wendye0
Treatment
Floating row cover after flower induction in September to Octobere0
Outcome
numbers of inflorescences, flowers, and fruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Floating row cover after flower induction in September to October hastened floral development in the fall and increased the numbers of inflorescences, flowers, and fruit in cv. Wendy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend repeated postharvest runner removal to increase strawberry yield potential.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
repeated removal of runners after harveste0
Qualifier
Northern climatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“repeated removal of runners after harvest and covering plants with a floating row cover after flower induction are recommended to increase strawberry yield potential in the Northern climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend floating row cover after flower induction to increase strawberry yield potential.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
covering plants with a floating row cover after flower inductione0
Qualifier
Northern climatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“repeated removal of runners after harvest and covering plants with a floating row cover after flower induction are recommended to increase strawberry yield potential in the Northern climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1195 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

trap barrier · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.