Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Cytological observation and transcriptome analysis reveal dynamic changes of Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice

Sanglin Liu; Tianya Wang; Guoxian Meng; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sheath blight, caused by Rhizoctonia solani , is a big threat to the global rice production. To characterize the early development of R. solani on rice leaf and leaf sheath, two genotypes, GD66 (a resistant genotype) and Lemont (a susceptible genotype), were observed using four cytological techniques: the whole-mount eosin B-staining confocal laser scanning microscopy (WE-CLSM), stereoscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and plastic semi-thin sectioning after in vitro inoculation. WE-CLSM observation showed that, at 12 h post-inoculation (hpi), the amount of hyphae increased dramatically on leaf and sheath surface, the infection cushions occurred and maintained at a huge number from about 18 to 36 hpi, and then the infection cushions disappeared gradually from about 42 to 72 hpi. Interestingly, R. solani could not only colonize on the abaxial surfaces of leaf sheath but also invade the paraxial side of the leaf sheath, which shows a different behavior from that of leaf. RNA sequencing detected 6,234 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for Lemont and 7,784 DEGs for GD66 at 24 hpi, and 2,523 DEGs for Lemont and 2,719 DEGs for GD66 at 48 hpi, suggesting that GD66 is recruiting more genes in fighting against the pathogen. Among DEGs, resistant genes, such as OsRLCK5 , Xa21 , and Pid2 , displayed higher expression in the resistant genotype than the susceptible genotype at both 24 and 48 hpi, which were validated by quantitative reverse transcription–PCR. Our results indicated that the resistance phenotype of GD66 was the consequence of recruiting a series of resistance genes involved in different regulatory pathways. WE-CLSM is a powerful technique for uncovering the mechanism of R. solani invading rice and for detecting rice sheath blight–resistant germplasm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyphae increased dramatically on rice leaf and sheath surfaces at 12 hpi.

Organ / stage
leaf and sheath surfacee0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
amount of hyphaee0
Direction
increased dramaticallye0
Value
12 h post-inoculation (hpi)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 12 h post-inoculation (hpi), the amount of hyphae increased dramatically on leaf and sheath surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection cushions were numerous from about 18 to 36 hpi.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
infection cushionse0
Direction
maintained at a huge numbere0
Qualifier
from about 18 to 36 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the infection cushions occurred and maintained at a huge number from about 18 to 36 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection cushions gradually disappeared from about 42 to 72 hpi.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
infection cushionse0
Direction
disappeared graduallye0
Qualifier
from about 42 to 72 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the infection cushions disappeared gradually from about 42 to 72 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani colonized both abaxial and paraxial sides of rice leaf sheath.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
colonize on the abaxial surfaces of leaf sheath but also invade the paraxial side of the leaf sheathe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. solani could not only colonize on the abaxial surfaces of leaf sheath but also invade the paraxial side of the leaf sheath”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 hpi, Lemont had 6,234 differentially expressed genes.

Material
Lemonte0
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
6,234e0
Qualifier
at 24 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RNA sequencing detected 6,234 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for Lemont and 7,784 DEGs for GD66 at 24 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 hpi, GD66 had 7,784 differentially expressed genes.

Material
GD66e0
Outcome
DEGse0
Value
7,784e0
Qualifier
at 24 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RNA sequencing detected 6,234 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for Lemont and 7,784 DEGs for GD66 at 24 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 48 hpi, Lemont had 2,523 differentially expressed genes.

Material
Lemonte0
Outcome
DEGse0
Value
2,523e0
Qualifier
at 48 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,523 DEGs for Lemont and 2,719 DEGs for GD66 at 48 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 48 hpi, GD66 had 2,719 differentially expressed genes.

Material
GD66e0
Outcome
DEGse0
Value
2,719e0
Qualifier
at 48 hpie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,523 DEGs for Lemont and 2,719 DEGs for GD66 at 48 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsRLCK5, Xa21, and Pid2 were more highly expressed in resistant than susceptible rice at 24 and 48 hpi.

Gene
OsRLCK5 , Xa21 , and Pid2e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at both 24 and 48 hpie0
Comparator
the susceptible genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OsRLCK5 , Xa21 , and Pid2 , displayed higher expression in the resistant genotype than the susceptible genotype at both 24 and 48 hpi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed GD66 resistance to recruitment of resistance genes across regulatory pathways.

Material
GD66e0
Gene
resistance genese0
Outcome
resistance phenotypee0
Qualifier
different regulatory pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resistance phenotype of GD66 was the consequence of recruiting a series of resistance genes involved in different regulatory pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhizoctonia solani colonization on leaf sheath and different genes recruited between the resistant and susceptible genotypes in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–209 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

WE-CLSM was presented as useful for revealing invasion and detecting resistant germplasm.

Outcome
uncovering the mechanism of R. solani invading rice and for detecting rice sheath blight–resistant germplasme0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WE-CLSM is a powerful technique for uncovering the mechanism of R. solani invading rice and for detecting rice sheath blight–resistant germplasm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1781 · show in text ↑