Paper · 2022 · Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology

Effect of Seed Priming on Germination and Seedling Parameters of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Lamjung, Nepal.

Rekha Badu; Santoshi Malla; Sara Rawal; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Poor seed germination obstructs the early and uniform seedling emergence at the sub-optimal conditions which can be a major setback to early spring cucumber growers. Different seed priming methods ought to be efficient solutions for the problem. To standardize the best priming method, an experiment was laid out in a Completely randomized design at the Horticulture lab of IAAS, Lamjung Campus. The treatment consisted of demineralized distilled water (hydropriming), hormonal priming (GA3 100ppm and GA3 200 ppm), halopriming (NaCl 0.5% and KNO3 0.5%), and non-primed seeds as control. The seeds were soaked in the respective treatment for 24 hours and then dried to initial moisture content under shade conditions. Observation recorded significantly highest germination percentage in GA3 100ppm (19.25%) and hydro priming (19.25%). The lowest mean germination time was found in GA3 100ppm (4.19days) which was significantly at par with GA3 200ppm (4.33days) and hydro priming (4.48days). The germination energy was found highest in GA3 100ppm (39.58) followed by GA3 200ppm (33.65) and dry weight was recorded highest in hydropriming (0.0252g) followed by GA3 100ppm (0.0250g) whereas the highest root length was observed in KNO3 priming (12.955cm) which is statistically at par with hydropriming (11.42cm), GA3 200 ppm (10.872cm) and NaCl priming (10.42cm). The plumule length was observed highest in KNO3 (13.00cm) followed by NaCl (11.25cm). All primed seeds showed increased seedling vigor compared to the unprimed seeds. The study showed that applied treatment notably increased the germination characteristics and seedling stand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 100 ppm priming gave the highest germination percentage in cucumber (19.25%).

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 100ppme1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly highest germination percentage in GA3 100ppm (19.25%) and hydro priming (19.25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming gave the highest germination percentage in cucumber (19.25%).

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
hydro priminge1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly highest germination percentage in GA3 100ppm (19.25%) and hydro priming (19.25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 100 ppm priming gave the lowest mean germination time in cucumber (4.19 days), statistically at par with GA3 200 ppm and hydropriming.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 100ppme2
Outcome
mean germination timee2
Direction
loweste2
Value
4.19dayse2
Qualifier
significantly at par with GA3 200ppm (4.33days) and hydro priming (4.48days)e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest mean germination time was found in GA3 100ppm (4.19days) which was significantly at par with GA3 200ppm (4.33days) and hydro priming (4.48days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 100 ppm priming gave the highest germination energy in cucumber (39.58).

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
GA3 100ppme3
Outcome
germination energye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
39.58e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“The germination energy was found highest in GA3 100ppm (39.58)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming gave the highest seedling dry weight in cucumber (0.0252 g).

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
hydropriminge4
Outcome
dry weighte4
Direction
higheste4
Value
0.0252ge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“dry weight was recorded highest in hydropriming (0.0252g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 priming gave the highest root length in cucumber (12.955 cm), statistically at par with hydropriming.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
KNO3 priminge5
Outcome
root lengthe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
12.955cme5
Qualifier
statistically at par with hydropriming (11.42cm)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest root length was observed in KNO3 priming (12.955cm) which is statistically at par with hydropriming (11.42cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 priming gave the highest plumule length in cucumber (13.00 cm), followed by NaCl.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
KNO3e6
Outcome
plumule lengthe6
Direction
higheste6
Value
13.00cme6
Qualifier
followed by NaCl (11.25cm)e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e6

“The plumule length was observed highest in KNO3 (13.00cm) followed by NaCl (11.25cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed cucumber seeds showed increased seedling vigor compared with unprimed seeds.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
primed seedse7
Outcome
seedling vigore7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
unprimed seedse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e7

“All primed seeds showed increased seedling vigor compared to the unprimed seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The applied seed priming increased germination characteristics and seedling stand in cucumber.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
applied treatmente0
Outcome
germination characteristics and seedling stande0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“The study showed that applied treatment notably increased the germination characteristics and seedling stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1637 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 35 positive, 10 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.