Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Biochar Application Maintain the Yield and Nitrogen Supply of Rice but Improve the Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Chuanchuan Ning; Rui Liu; Xizhi Kuang; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Excessive application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer will cause many adverse consequences in paddy fields, especially for the reduction in N use efficiency. Biochar can be used to replace part of N fertilizer for rice production. A field experiment of 2-year/four-season was conducted to investigate the effects of N fertilizer reduction combined with rice straw biochar application on rice yield, soil fertility, and N use efficiency. The experiment contained six treatments: No N application (CK), customary N application (N100), 20% N reduction (N80), 20% N reduction + biochar (N80+BC), 40% N reduction (N60), and 40% N reduction + biochar (N60+BC). Compared with N100, N reduction alone had no significant impact on the number of tillers and aboveground biomass of rice, exceptfor N60 which slightly reduced grain yield, while biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone. The average contribution of biochar to grain yield on the basis of N80 and N60 were 5.8% and 7.7%, respectively. Notably, biochar incorporation further improved the agronomic N efficiency (54.5–309.4% over N100) and apparent N recovery (25.7–150.5% over N100) on the basis of N reduction. Furthermore, biochar application could not only maintain N nutrition level of rice, but also improve soil fertility mainly by increasing soil pH and organic matter. Therefore, integrated application of mineral N fertilizer and biochar is a feasible nutrient management measure to increase rice yield and soil fertility, and improve N use efficiency in paddy ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N reduction alone had no significant effect on tiller number and aboveground biomass of rice compared with N100.

Treatment
N reduction alonee1
Outcome
number of tillers and aboveground biomasse1
Direction
no significant impacte1
Comparator
N100e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared with N100, N reduction alone had no significant impact on the number of tillers and aboveground biomass of rice, exceptfor N60 which slightly reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N60 slightly reduced rice grain yield compared with N100.

Treatment
N60e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
slightly reducede1
Comparator
N100e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Compared with N100, N reduction alone had no significant impact on the number of tillers and aboveground biomass of rice, exceptfor N60 which slightly reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar incorporation tended to give higher tillers, aboveground biomass and grain yield of rice than N reduction alone.

Treatment
biochar incorporatione2
Outcome
tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
tendede2
Comparator
N reduction alonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar contributed an average of 5.8% to rice grain yield on the basis of N80.

Treatment
biochare3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
5.8%e3
Qualifier
on the basis of N80 and N60e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–959 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average contribution of biochar to grain yield on the basis of N80 and N60 were 5.8% and 7.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar contributed an average of 7.7% to rice grain yield on the basis of N60.

Treatment
biochare3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
7.7%e3
Qualifier
on the basis of N80 and N60e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–959 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average contribution of biochar to grain yield on the basis of N80 and N60 were 5.8% and 7.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar incorporation further improved agronomic N efficiency of rice by 54.5–309.4% over N100.

Treatment
biochar incorporatione4
Outcome
agronomic N efficiencye4
Direction
improvede4
Value
54.5–309.4%e4
Comparator
N100e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–959 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar incorporation further improved the agronomic N efficiency (54.5–309.4% over N100) and apparent N recovery (25.7–150.5% over N100)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar incorporation further improved apparent N recovery of rice by 25.7–150.5% over N100.

Treatment
biochar incorporatione4
Outcome
apparent N recoverye4
Direction
improvede4
Value
25.7–150.5%e4
Comparator
N100e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar incorporation tended to obtain higher tillers, aboveground biomass, and grain yield of rice compared with N reduction alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–959 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar incorporation further improved the agronomic N efficiency (54.5–309.4% over N100) and apparent N recovery (25.7–150.5% over N100)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application maintained the N nutrition level of rice.

Treatment
biochar applicatione5
Outcome
N nutrition levele5
Direction
maintaine5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“biochar application could not only maintain N nutrition level of rice, but also improve soil fertility mainly by increasing soil pH and organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application improved soil fertility mainly by increasing soil pH and organic matter.

Treatment
biochar applicatione5
Outcome
soil pH and organic mattere5
Direction
increasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“biochar application could not only maintain N nutrition level of rice, but also improve soil fertility mainly by increasing soil pH and organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1413 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated application of mineral N fertilizer and biochar is recommended as a feasible nutrient management measure for rice in paddy ecosystems.

Outcome
integrated application of mineral N fertilizer and biochare6
Setting
paddy ecosysteme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“integrated application of mineral N fertilizer and biochar is a feasible nutrient management measure to increase rice yield and soil fertility, and improve N use efficiency in paddy ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1617 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 44 positive, 2 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.