Paper · 2019 · PLoS ONE

Influence of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 on yield, biomass production, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes

Khin Thuzar Win; Keiki Okazaki; Taiichiro Ookawa; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar is widely used as a soil amendment to increase crop yields. However, the impact of the interaction between the biochar and microbial inoculants (e.g., biofertilizer) on plant nutrient uptake and yield in forage rice is not fully understood. A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29. Positive effects of biochar and biofertilizer, alone or in a combination, on growth traits, nutrient uptake, and yield components were dependent on the rice genotypes. Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer influenced the overall growth of plants positively and increased straw and above-ground biomass in both genotypes. However, although biochar application significantly increased grain yield in LTAT-29, this was not the case in Fukuhibiki. Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer, either alone or combined, significantly affected plant nutrient uptake but the effect largely depended on rice genotype. Results of this study indicate that biochar amendment and TUAT-1 biofertilizer can enhance forage rice productivity depending on genotypes, and therefore, there is a need to consider plant genetic composition when evaluating the potential for crop response to these soil amendments before application on a commercial scale.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer increased straw and above-ground biomass in both forage rice genotypes.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Material
Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29e0
Treatment
Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizere1
Outcome
straw and above-ground biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer influenced the overall growth of plants positively and increased straw and above-ground biomass in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application significantly increased grain yield of forage rice line LTAT-29.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Material
LTAT-29e2
Treatment
biochar applicatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“although biochar application significantly increased grain yield in LTAT-29, this was not the case in Fukuhibiki”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application did not change grain yield of forage rice Fukuhibiki.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Material
Fukuhibikie2
Treatment
biochar applicatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“although biochar application significantly increased grain yield in LTAT-29, this was not the case in Fukuhibiki”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer significantly affected plant nutrient uptake in forage rice, depending on genotype.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Treatment
Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizere3
Outcome
plant nutrient uptakee3
Qualifier
depended on rice genotypee3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e3

“Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer, either alone or combined, significantly affected plant nutrient uptake but the effect largely depended on rice genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar amendment and TUAT-1 biofertilizer can enhance forage rice productivity, depending on genotypes.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Treatment
biochar amendment and TUAT-1 biofertilizere4
Outcome
forage rice productivitye4
Direction
enhancee4
Qualifier
depending on genotypese4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e4

“biochar amendment and TUAT-1 biofertilizer can enhance forage rice productivity depending on genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer improved the overall growth of forage rice plants.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Treatment
Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizere1
Outcome
overall growthe1
Direction
positivelye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar and TUAT-1 biofertilizer influenced the overall growth of plants positively and increased straw and above-ground biomass in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–827 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend considering plant genetic composition when evaluating forage rice response to these soil amendments before commercial use.

Taxon
forage ricee0
Outcome
consider plant genetic composition when evaluating the potential for crop responsee5

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to evaluate the synergistic effects of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 biofertilizer application on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes; Fukuhibiki and the newly bred line, LTAT-29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–511 · show in text ↑
e5

“there is a need to consider plant genetic composition when evaluating the potential for crop response to these soil amendments before application on a commercial scale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1429 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 64 positive, 6 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

other · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 161 positive, 5 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

inoculation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 362 positive, 37 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.