Paper · 2022 · Scientific Reports

Effects of application of rice husk biochar and limestone on cadmium accumulation in wheat under glasshouse and field conditions

Zehui Niu; Jiayan Ma; Xianzhi Fang; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) has seriously threatened the safe production of food crops. Passivator amendments are commonly used to control the soil Cd availability. Yet, few studies are tested to explore the effect of the combination of various amendments. Here, we investigated the effects of different amendments (2% rice husk biochar, 2% limestone, and 1% rice husk biochar + 1% limestone) on the growth and Cd accumulation of wheat in pot and field experiments. The results showed that under the low soil Cd condition, the maximum increase of soil pH (1.83) was found in the limestone treatment compared to CK in pot experiment. Compared with the CK, the treatment of rice husk biochar decreased soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 25% and 31.2%, respectively. In contrast, under high soil Cd condition, the highest soil pH was observed in limestone, while the lowest soil Cd availability and grain Cd concentrations were found in rice husk biochar treatment. In the field experiment, the treatment of 1% rice husk biochar + 1% limestone caused a significant increase of soil pH by about 28.2%, whereas the treatment of 2% rice husk biochar reduced soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 38.9% and 38.5% compared to the CK. Therefore, rice husk biochar showed great potential to reduce Cd availability and ensure safe food production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low soil Cd, limestone gave the maximum soil pH increase of 1.83 against CK in pots.

Treatment
limestone treatmente0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.83e0
Qualifier
low soil Cd conditione0
Comparator
CKe0
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the low soil Cd condition, the maximum increase of soil pH (1.83) was found in the limestone treatment compared to CK in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk biochar reduced soil Cd availability about 25% versus CK.

Treatment
rice husk biochare0
Outcome
soil Cd availabilitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the CK, the treatment of rice husk biochar decreased soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 25% and 31.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk biochar reduced wheat grain Cd content about 31.2% versus CK.

Treatment
rice husk biochare0
Outcome
grain Cd contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
31.2%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the CK, the treatment of rice husk biochar decreased soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 25% and 31.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high soil Cd, limestone yielded the highest soil pH.

Treatment
limestonee0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
high soil Cd conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high soil Cd condition, the highest soil pH was observed in limestone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high soil Cd, rice husk biochar gave the lowest soil Cd availability and grain Cd concentrations.

Treatment
rice husk biochar treatmente0
Outcome
soil Cd availability and grain Cd concentrationse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest soil Cd availability and grain Cd concentrations were found in rice husk biochar treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, combined 1% biochar and 1% limestone increased soil pH about 28.2%.

Treatment
1% rice husk biochar + 1% limestonee0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.2%e0
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field experiment, the treatment of 1% rice husk biochar + 1% limestone caused a significant increase of soil pH by about 28.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, 2% biochar reduced soil Cd availability about 38.9% against CK.

Treatment
2% rice husk biochare0
Outcome
soil Cd availabilitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.9%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 2% rice husk biochar reduced soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 38.9% and 38.5% compared to the CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, 2% biochar reduced grain Cd content about 38.5% against CK.

Treatment
2% rice husk biochare0
Outcome
grain Cd contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 2% rice husk biochar reduced soil Cd availability and grain Cd content by about 38.9% and 38.5% compared to the CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–90 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

calcium oxide · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.