Paper · 2021 · Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences

Supplementary Applications of Phosphorus to Improve Yield and Fruit Quality of 'LeConte' Pear Trees under Calcareous Soil Conditions

E Abd El-Razek; M Abd El-Migeed; N Abdel-Hamid; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) deficiency is one of the major problems in agricultural soils for crop production around the world. Mono ammonium phosphate (MAP) as foliar application used an effective tool to enhance nutritional status of fruit trees not only overcome leaf p deficiency but also improve flowering, increase yield and enhance fruit quality. However, use of bio fertilizers such as phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB) proved to friendly environmentally and economical way for increasing P availability and improving P use efficiency under P deficiency conditions. Consequently, the aim of the present trail was to study the effects of MAP at 1% foliar application and/or soil application of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB) solely or in combination as supplementary P doses (beside H3PO4 common P fertigated source) under calcareous soil conditions on full bloom time, flowering %, yield (kg/tree) and fruit quality not only fruit physical properties i.e. fruit weight, length (L) and circumference (C), shape index (L/C) and fruit firmness but also fruit chemical components via TSS%, acidity%, and TSS/acid ratio as well as nutrient status of macro & micro leaf contents (N,P,K, Fe, Zn and Mn) of "Le Conte" pear trees. The experiment was carried out during the two successive seasons on 12 years old 'Le Conte" pear trees budded on betulifolia rootstocks (Pyrus betulifolia) grown in calcareous soil under drip irrigation system from Nile river source in a private orchid at Km 80 Alex-Cairo desert Road, El-Nubaria district, El-Behaira, Egypt. All trees received the standard horticultural practices & the experiment was designed in a complete randomized block and the treatments were as follows: (T1) control; H3PO4 common P fertigated source. (T2) T1 + MAP at 1 % as foliar application. (T3) T1 + Bacillus megatherium P solubilizing bacteria (PSB) as soil application. (T4) T2 +T3. The result showed that foliar MAP spray (T2) and PSB soil application (T3) independently improved all aforementioned parameters. However, both T2&T3 gave more or less similar result values and no significant differences were detected between them. In this respect, T2&T3 when applied together (T4) maximized to a grate extend enhancement in most studied parameters and increased yield (kg/tree) by about (167%) than the control. Improvement in leaf P nutritional status after MAP foliar spray to an adequate level (>0.3%) in the range of P and N fertilized plants as well as availability of P, Fe, Zn and Mn following soil PSB application improved nutritional status and help in better management of P fertilization in pear trees grown under calcareous soil condition. Generally, T4 (MAP + PSb) is recommended treatment since, it promotes effectively the nutrient status that achieved the shortest time to FBD, highest flowering %, yield and fruit quality of "Le-Conte" pear trees under calcareous soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP alone improved measured pear flowering, yield, fruit quality and leaf nutrients.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
foliar MAP spray (T2)e0
Outcome
all aforementioned parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar MAP spray (T2) and PSB soil application (T3) independently improved all aforementioned parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB alone improved measured pear flowering, yield, fruit quality and leaf nutrients.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
PSB soil application (T3)e0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
all aforementioned parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar MAP spray (T2) and PSB soil application (T3) independently improved all aforementioned parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP and PSB alone produced similar outcomes without a significant difference.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Outcome
result valuese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
T2&T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both T2&T3 gave more or less similar result values and no significant differences were detected between them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2034–2143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined MAP and PSB increased pear yield about 167% relative to control.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
T2&T3 when applied together (T4)e0
Outcome
yield (kg/tree)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
167%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2&T3 when applied together (T4) maximized to a grate extend enhancement in most studied parameters and increased yield (kg/tree) by about (167%) than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2161–2324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximized most measured pear parameters.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
T2&T3 when applied together (T4)e0
Outcome
most studied parameterse0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2&T3 when applied together (T4) maximized to a grate extend enhancement in most studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2161–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MAP foliar spray raised leaf P status to an adequate level above 0.3%.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
MAP foliar spraye0
Outcome
leaf P nutritional statuse0
Direction
Improvemente0
Value
>0.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improvement in leaf P nutritional status after MAP foliar spray to an adequate level (>0.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2325–2417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB soil application increased availability of P, Fe, Zn and Mn.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communist0
Treatment
soil PSB applicatione0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
availability of P, Fe, Zn and Mne0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“availability of P, Fe, Zn and Mn following soil PSB application improved nutritional status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2471–2562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined MAP and PSB for pear production under calcareous soil.

Taxon
pear treesPyrus communise0
Outcome
T4 (MAP + PSb) is recommended treatmente0
Qualifier
under calcareous soil conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 (MAP + PSb) is recommended treatment since, it promotes effectively the nutrient status that achieved the shortest time to FBD, highest flowering %, yield and fruit quality of "Le-Conte" pear trees under calcareous soil conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2676–2910 · show in text ↑

ammonium dihydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.