Paper · 2022 · Reviews In Food And Agriculture

EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT BIOPESTICIDES AGAINST FRUIT BORER INFESTATION ON CAPSICUM (Capsicum annuum L.)

Khan Tauhidur Rahman; M. M. Rahman; S. M. Mizanur Rahman; et al.

10
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Capsicum has been found to be infested by different insect and mite species. In different growing zones, capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.) inflict significant crop damage. The purpose of this study was to see how efficient biopesticides are against the capsicum fruit borer. BARI Misti Morich-1 was used in this study. The experiment comprised with five treatments and was laid in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications. The treatments were: T1=Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC @ 1 ml/ L of water), T2=Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC @ 0.3 ml/ L of water), T3=Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt spray @ 2 g/ L of water), T4=Abamectin (Border plus 1.8 EC @ 1 ml/ L of water) and T5=Untreated control. All the treatments were applied at 10 days intervals. During the study period, the maximum weight of healthy fruits plant-1 (876.84 g) was calculated from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]. On the contrary, the minimum weight of healthy fruits plant-1 (320.26 g) was obtained from control treatment (T5). The least infested fruit weight plant-1 (268.00 g) was recorded from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]. On the contrary, the maximum weight of infested fruit (284.92 g) was recorded from untreated control (T5). The least percentage of fruit infestation in terms of weight (23.41%) was obtained from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)] and the maximum fruit infestation (47.08%) was calculated from untreated control (T5). The weight reduction from fruit infestation over control was estimated and the maximum value (58.28%) was obtained from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)], while the minimum (19.74%) reduction of fruit infestation over control was in T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)] treatment. The highest weight of fruit yield (27.26 t ha⁻¹) was recorded from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]. The lowest yield (14.41 t ha⁻¹) of fruit was recorded from untreated control (T5) and was closely (16.71 t ha⁻¹) followed by T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)]. Treatment T3 (Bacillus thuringiensis (BT spray)) showed higher weight of fruit yield (24.37 t ha⁻¹) but significantly differed from T2 treatment. The weight increase in yield over control was estimated, the highest value (89.17%) was obtained from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)], while the lowest value was (15.97 %) from the treatment T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)]. Biopesticides were found to be effective against the Capsicum fruit borer in the study when compared to the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the maximum healthy fruit weight per plant (876.84 g), against 320.26 g in control.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight of healthy fruits plant-1e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
876.84 ge1
Qualifier
320.26 ge2
Comparator
control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the maximum weight of healthy fruits plant-1 (876.84 g) was calculated from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–938 · show in text ↑
e2

“the minimum weight of healthy fruits plant-1 (320.26 g) was obtained from control treatment (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1053 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the least infested fruit weight per plant (268.00 g), against 284.92 g in untreated control.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
infested fruit weight plant-1e1
Direction
leaste1
Value
268.00 ge1
Qualifier
284.92 ge2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The least infested fruit weight plant-1 (268.00 g) was recorded from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1154 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum weight of infested fruit (284.92 g) was recorded from untreated control (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1261 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the least percentage of fruit infestation by weight (23.41%), against 47.08% in untreated control.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
percentage of fruit infestation in terms of weighte1
Direction
leaste1
Value
23.41%e1
Qualifier
47.08%e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The least percentage of fruit infestation in terms of weight (23.41%) was obtained from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1395 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum fruit infestation (47.08%) was calculated from untreated control (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1481 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the maximum weight reduction from fruit infestation over control (58.28%).

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight reduction from fruit infestation over controle1
Direction
maximume1
Value
58.28%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The weight reduction from fruit infestation over control was estimated and the maximum value (58.28%) was obtained from T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1633 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin gave the minimum weight reduction from fruit infestation over control (19.74%).

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
reduction of fruit infestation over controle1
Direction
minimume1
Value
19.74%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the minimum (19.74%) reduction of fruit infestation over control was in T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)] treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1760 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the highest fruit yield (27.26 t/ha), against 14.41 t/ha in untreated control.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight of fruit yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
27.26 t ha⁻¹e1
Qualifier
14.41 t ha⁻¹e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest weight of fruit yield (27.26 t ha⁻¹) was recorded from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1873 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest yield (14.41 t ha⁻¹) of fruit was recorded from untreated control (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1875–1956 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis gave a higher fruit yield (24.37 t/ha) that significantly differed from Spinosad.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis (BT spray)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight of fruit yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
24.37 t ha⁻¹e1
Qualifier
but significantly differed from T2 treatmente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Treatment T3 (Bacillus thuringiensis (BT spray)) showed higher weight of fruit yield (24.37 t ha⁻¹) but significantly differed from T2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2039–2183 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin fruit yield (16.71 t/ha) closely followed the untreated control (14.41 t/ha).

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
followede1
Value
16.71 t ha⁻¹e1
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“and was closely (16.71 t ha⁻¹) followed by T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2037 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest yield (14.41 t ha⁻¹) of fruit was recorded from untreated control (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1875–1956 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the highest yield increase over control (89.17%).

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight increase in yield over controle1
Direction
higheste1
Value
89.17%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The weight increase in yield over control was estimated, the highest value (89.17%) was obtained from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2185–2331 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin gave the lowest yield increase over control (15.97%).

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)e1
Interactor
capsicum fruit borerse3pest
Outcome
weight increase in yield over controle2
Direction
loweste1
Value
15.97 %e1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“while the lowest value was (15.97 %) from the treatment T1 [Azadirachtin (Bioneem plus 1 EC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2333–2426 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weight increase in yield over control was estimated, the highest value (89.17%) was obtained from the treatment T2 [Spinosad (Success 2.5 SC)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2185–2331 · show in text ↑
e3

“capsicum fruit borers (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Spodoptera litura Fab.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Capsicum annuum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 61 positive, 5 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

transgenic · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.