Abstract
In Indonesia, soybean is the most important legume crop, which can develop Rhizobium and mycorrhizal symbiosis for better nutrition, especially in dryland areas. A trial for investigating responses of several varieties of soybean to co-inoculation with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizers has been carried out in East Lombok, Indonesia, from August to October 2022. The Randomized Block Design was used to arrange the two treatment factors tested, i.e. biofertilizer application (B0= without biofertilizer; B1= Rhizobium inoculant; B2: co-inoculation of soybean with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizers) and soybean varieties (V1= Detap, V2: Biosoy-2, V3= Dena-1). The trial was made in three blocks (replications). The variables included plant height, trifoliate number, root volume, and biomass yield and pod number as a yield potential. Results indicated that co-inoculation several varieties of soybean with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer increased yield potential of soybean in dryland as indicated by higher nodule number, trifoliate number, pod number and biomass yield of soybean, especially of Detap (V1) and Dena-1 (V3) varieties under co-inoculation treatment (B2), compared to inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1) or unioculated control (B0). Further studies on more varieties of soybean need to be conducted in different types of soil to find out the most responsive varieties to co-inoculation with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer to increase soybean productivity especially in dryland areas.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer increased yield potential of soybean in dryland compared with Rhizobium only or the unioculated control.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizere1
- Second interactor
- mycorrhizae1symbiont
- Outcome
- yield potentiale1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- unioculated controle1
- Setting
- drylande1
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Several Soybean Varieties”
e1“Results indicated that co-inoculation several varieties of soybean with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer increased yield potential of soybean in dryland as indicated by higher nodule number, trifoliate number, pod number and biomass yield of soybean, especially of Detap (V1) and Dena-1 (V3) varieties under co-inoculation treatment (B2), compared to inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1) or unioculated control (B0)”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation treatment (B2) increased nodule number, trifoliate number and pod number of soybean compared with inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1).
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- co-inoculation treatment (B2)e1
- Second interactor
- mycorrhizae1symbiont
- Outcome
- nodule number, trifoliate number, pod numbere1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Several Soybean Varieties”
e1“Results indicated that co-inoculation several varieties of soybean with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer increased yield potential of soybean in dryland as indicated by higher nodule number, trifoliate number, pod number and biomass yield of soybean, especially of Detap (V1) and Dena-1 (V3) varieties under co-inoculation treatment (B2), compared to inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1) or unioculated control (B0)”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased biomass yield of soybean, especially of Detap and Dena-1 varieties.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Material
- Detap (V1) and Dena-1 (V3) varietiese1
- Treatment
- co-inoculation treatment (B2)e1
- Second interactor
- mycorrhizae1symbiont
- Outcome
- biomass yield of soybeane1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- unioculated control (B0)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Response of Several Soybean Varieties”
e1“Results indicated that co-inoculation several varieties of soybean with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza biofertilizer increased yield potential of soybean in dryland as indicated by higher nodule number, trifoliate number, pod number and biomass yield of soybean, especially of Detap (V1) and Dena-1 (V3) varieties under co-inoculation treatment (B2), compared to inoculation with Rhizobium only (B1) or unioculated control (B0)”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →inoculation · Rhizobium · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.