Paper · 2022 · Advances in Horticultural Science

Maintaining postharvest quality of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder) using cactus (Opuntia stricta L.) mucilage coating

Maurine Aloo; Arnold Mathew Opiyo; Mwanarusi Saidi

7
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) experiences significant qualitative and quantitative loss during postharvest. This study aimed at providing an alternative postharvest handling technology for bell pepper. The factor studied was cactus (Opuntia stricta L.) mucilage coating at four levels: 0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%. The fruits were stored under ambient conditions (25 ± 2°C temperature and 65 ± 2% relative humidity) until senescence. Weight loss and total soluble solids content were determined at an interval of 3 days whereas iron and ascorbic acid content were determined at an interval of 4 days. Shelf life elapsed when fruit lost 25% of their initial weight on average. Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%, maintained total soluble solids by up to 14.93%, iron by up to 6.46%, ascorbic acid by up to 19.46% and extended shelf life by up to 6 days. Cactus mucilage coating at 1% was the best treatment and therefore can be used by bell pepper growers, retailers, and consumers to maintain postharvest quality and extend shelf life of bell pepper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating reduced bell pepper weight loss by up to 21.64% during ambient storage.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Material
California Wondert0
Organ / stage
fruitse3
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coatinge4
Outcome
weight losse4
Direction
reducede4
Value
21.64%e4
Comparator
0% (distilled water)e2
Setting
ambient conditionse3

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–323 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fruits were stored under ambient conditions (25 ± 2°C temperature and 65 ± 2% relative humidity) until senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–442 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating maintained bell pepper total soluble solids by up to 14.93%.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coatinge4
Outcome
total soluble solidse5
Direction
maintainede5
Value
14.93%e5
Comparator
0% (distilled water)e2

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–323 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–745 · show in text ↑
e5

“maintained total soluble solids by up to 14.93%, iron by up to 6.46%, ascorbic acid by up to 19.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating maintained bell pepper iron by up to 6.46%.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coatinge4
Outcome
irone5
Direction
maintainede5
Value
6.46%e5
Comparator
0% (distilled water)e2

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–323 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–745 · show in text ↑
e5

“maintained total soluble solids by up to 14.93%, iron by up to 6.46%, ascorbic acid by up to 19.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating maintained bell pepper ascorbic acid by up to 19.46%.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coatinge4
Outcome
ascorbic acide5
Direction
maintainede5
Value
19.46%e5
Comparator
0% (distilled water)e2

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–323 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–745 · show in text ↑
e5

“maintained total soluble solids by up to 14.93%, iron by up to 6.46%, ascorbic acid by up to 19.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating extended bell pepper shelf life by up to 6 days.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coatinge4
Outcome
shelf lifee6
Direction
extendede6
Value
6 dayse6
Comparator
0% (distilled water)e2

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% (distilled water), 1, 2, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–323 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cactus mucilage coating reduced weight loss by up to 21.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–745 · show in text ↑
e6

“extended shelf life by up to 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cactus mucilage coating at 1% was the best treatment for bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppert0
Treatment
Cactus mucilage coating at 1%e7
Outcome
best treatmente7
Direction
beste7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. California Wonder)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Cactus mucilage coating at 1% was the best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–940 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cactus mucilage coating to bell pepper growers, retailers and consumers to maintain postharvest quality and extend shelf life.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Outcome
postharvest qualitye0

Verbatim

e0

“can be used by bell pepper growers, retailers, and consumers to maintain postharvest quality and extend shelf life of bell pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1084 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.