Paper · 2017 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

Evaluation of Planting Date, Variety, and PRE Herbicide on Thrips Infestations, Cotton Growth and Development, and Lint Yield

J. Drake Copeland; Darrin M. Dodds; Angus L. Catchot Jr.; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Early season thrips infestations and preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications and their interaction with weather can impact early season cotton growth. Research was conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Mississippi to evaluate the impact of planting date, varietal maturity, and PRE herbicide on thrips infestations in cotton. Delta and Pine Land (DP) 0912 B2RF (short-season), and DP 1252 B2RF (full season) cotton varieties, were planted in mid-April, mid-May, late-May, and mid-June. Acceleron® N seed treatment (thiamethoxam + pyraclostrobin +abamectin) was utilized on seed at each location. Fluometuron + S-metolachlor was applied PRE at 1.12 + 1.07 kg ai ha-1and a non-herbicide treated check was included for comparison purposes. Cotton biomass at the two-leaf stage was greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in late-May at 3.2 g per five plants. Cotton treated with fluometuron + S- metolachlor PRE had less biomass at the two-leaf stage than cotton not treated with a PRE herbicide. Immature thrips counts were greatest on late-May planted cotton at both the two- and four-leaf stages. Cotton height at the four-leaf stage was greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in mid-June or in the absence of PRE herbicide application. Delayed maturity was observed when planting occurred after mid-May. Cotton treated with S-metolachlor + fluometuron yielded significantly less than cotton not treated with a PRE herbicide. Lint yields were greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in mid-April, mid-May, and late-May or with DP 1252 B2RF planted in mid-April and mid-May. Lint yields from these combinations ranged from 2195 kg ha-1 to 2429 kg ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP 0912 planted in late May had greatest two-leaf biomass, 3.2 g per five plants.

Material
DP 0912 B2RFe0
Treatment
planted in late-Maye0
Outcome
Cotton biomasse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
3.2 g per five plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton biomass at the two-leaf stage was greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in late-May at 3.2 g per five plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE herbicide reduced two-leaf biomass compared with no PRE herbicide.

Treatment
fluometuron + S- metolachlor PREe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
cotton not treated with a PRE herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton treated with fluometuron + S- metolachlor PRE had less biomass at the two-leaf stage than cotton not treated with a PRE herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late May planting produced greatest immature thrips counts at two and four leaves.

Treatment
late-May plantede0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
Immature thrips countse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Immature thrips counts were greatest on late-May planted cotton at both the two- and four-leaf stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP 0912 planted in mid June had greatest four-leaf height.

Material
DP 0912 B2RFe0
Treatment
planted in mid-Junee0
Outcome
Cotton heighte0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton height at the four-leaf stage was greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in mid-June or in the absence of PRE herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-leaf cotton height was greatest without PRE herbicide.

Treatment
absence of PRE herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
Cotton heighte0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton height at the four-leaf stage was greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in mid-June or in the absence of PRE herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting after mid May delayed maturity.

Treatment
planting occurred after mid-Maye0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
Delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed maturity was observed when planting occurred after mid-May.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE herbicide significantly lowered lint yield compared with no PRE herbicide.

Treatment
S-metolachlor + fluometurone0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
cotton not treated with a PRE herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton treated with S-metolachlor + fluometuron yielded significantly less than cotton not treated with a PRE herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP 0912 had greatest lint yields at mid April, mid May and late May planting.

Material
DP 0912 B2RFe0
Treatment
planted in mid-April, mid-May, and late-Maye0
Outcome
Lint yieldse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lint yields were greatest when DP 0912 B2RF was planted in mid-April, mid-May, and late-May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DP 1252 had greatest lint yields at mid April and mid May planting.

Material
DP 1252 B2RFe0
Treatment
planted in mid-April and mid-Maye0
Outcome
Lint yieldse0
Value
2195 kg ha-1 to 2429 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DP 1252 B2RF planted in mid-April and mid-May. Lint yields from these combinations ranged from 2195 kg ha-1 to 2429 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

fluometuron · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The same HADSS sequence gave equivalent or higher cotton yield than the conventional sequence.

    Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton · 2001 · compared with trifluralin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac EPOST fb MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY

    Opposite direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

metolachlor · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fluometuron · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.