Abstract
In view of the important role of microelements in the physiological and biochemical processes in plants, the study of new types of microfertilizers is of undoubted interest, both in theoretical and practical terms. The possibility of using microelement complexes together with chemical and biological plant protection products makes it possible to combine the terms of their use and increase the biological effectiveness of preparations. At the same time, the effectiveness of microfertilizers largely depends on the degree of soil cultivation, which served as the basis for this research. The paper presents the results of the use of microfertilizers in combination with mineral fertilizers for winter wheat of the Moskovskaya 56 variety and spring barley of the NUR variety, obtained in two long-term field experiments on soddy-podzolic heavy loamy soil of the Moscow Region. The use of the microelement complex “Microel” against the background of an organo-mineral fertilizer system on well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soil increased the yield of winter wheat by 8%, spring barley – by 9%, and the use of microfertilizer “Aquamix-t” – by 21% and 13% respectively. The introduction of zinc microfertilizers on poorly cultivated soil against the background of liming at pHKCl 5.4 contributed to an increase in the yield of winter wheat by 10%, spring barley – by 12% with a yield against the background of NPK of 5.90 t/ha and 4.42 t/ha, respectively. With the complex use of macro- and microfertilizers, grain quality indicators significantly increase: the content of protein, crude gluten, and the weight of 1000 grains.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Microel increased winter wheat yield by 8% on well-cultivated soil.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- Moskovskaya 56e1
- Treatment
- microelement complex “Microel”e0
- Outcome
- yield of winter wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8%e0
- Comparator
- organo-mineral fertilizer systeme0
- Setting
- well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of the microelement complex “Microel” against the background of an organo-mineral fertilizer system on well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soil increased the yield of winter wheat by 8%, spring barley – by 9%”
e1“The paper presents the results of the use of microfertilizers in combination with mineral fertilizers for winter wheat of the Moskovskaya 56 variety and spring barley of the NUR variety, obtained in two long-term field experiments on soddy-podzolic heavy loamy soil of the Moscow Region.”
Claim · model-written summary
Microel increased spring barley yield by 9% on well-cultivated soil.
- Taxon
- spring barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Material
- NURe1
- Treatment
- microelement complex “Microel”e0
- Outcome
- spring barleye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9%e0
- Comparator
- organo-mineral fertilizer systeme0
- Setting
- well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The use of the microelement complex “Microel” against the background of an organo-mineral fertilizer system on well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soil increased the yield of winter wheat by 8%, spring barley – by 9%”
e1“The paper presents the results of the use of microfertilizers in combination with mineral fertilizers for winter wheat of the Moskovskaya 56 variety and spring barley of the NUR variety, obtained in two long-term field experiments on soddy-podzolic heavy loamy soil of the Moscow Region.”
Claim · model-written summary
Aquamix-t increased winter wheat yield by 21%.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- microfertilizer “Aquamix-t”e0
- Outcome
- yield of winter wheate1
- Value
- 21%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of microfertilizer “Aquamix-t” – by 21% and 13% respectively.”
e1“The use of the microelement complex “Microel” against the background of an organo-mineral fertilizer system on well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soil increased the yield of winter wheat by 8%, spring barley – by 9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Aquamix-t increased spring barley yield by 13%.
- Taxon
- spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- microfertilizer “Aquamix-t”e0
- Outcome
- spring barleye1
- Value
- 13%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of microfertilizer “Aquamix-t” – by 21% and 13% respectively.”
e1“The use of the microelement complex “Microel” against the background of an organo-mineral fertilizer system on well-cultivated soddy-podzolic soil increased the yield of winter wheat by 8%, spring barley – by 9%”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc microfertilizers increased winter wheat yield by 10% on poorly cultivated soil.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- zinc microfertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yield of winter wheate0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 10%e0
- Qualifier
- 5.90 t/hae0
- Comparator
- liming at pHKCl 5.4e0
- Setting
- poorly cultivated soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The introduction of zinc microfertilizers on poorly cultivated soil against the background of liming at pHKCl 5.4 contributed to an increase in the yield of winter wheat by 10%, spring barley – by 12% with a yield against the background of NPK of 5.90 t/ha and 4.42 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc microfertilizers increased spring barley yield by 12% on poorly cultivated soil.
- Taxon
- spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- zinc microfertilizerse0
- Outcome
- spring barleye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12%e0
- Qualifier
- 4.42 t/hae0
- Comparator
- liming at pHKCl 5.4e0
- Setting
- poorly cultivated soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The introduction of zinc microfertilizers on poorly cultivated soil against the background of liming at pHKCl 5.4 contributed to an increase in the yield of winter wheat by 10%, spring barley – by 12% with a yield against the background of NPK of 5.90 t/ha and 4.42 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined macro- and microfertilizers significantly increased protein and crude gluten content and 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- complex use of macro- and microfertilizerse0
- Outcome
- content of protein, crude gluten, and the weight of 1000 grainse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With the complex use of macro- and microfertilizers, grain quality indicators significantly increase: the content of protein, crude gluten, and the weight of 1000 grains.”
e1“The paper presents the results of the use of microfertilizers in combination with mineral fertilizers for winter wheat of the Moskovskaya 56 variety and spring barley of the NUR variety, obtained in two long-term field experiments on soddy-podzolic heavy loamy soil of the Moscow Region.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →zinc atom · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.