Paper · 2023 · LWT

Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life

Lorena Martínez-Zamora; Noelia Castillejo; Francisco Artés–Hernández

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the effect of visible spectrum LED lighting during shelf-life on physicochemical quality and the main bioactive compounds of Kumato® cherry tomatoes. Tomatoes were stored 13 days at 5 °C under white (W), blue (B), blue + red (B + R), green + red (G + R), and green + far-red (G + FR) LED lights. Darkness (D) was used as control. Tomatoes under illumination showed higher weight losses and firmness decreases (30–35%). No chilling injury was observed. B + R lighting increased the carotenoid content by ∼27%, while G + R and G + FR reported an increase ∼30% in phenolics. B and B + R showed the highest increase in the phytochemical biosynthesis (lycopene and naringenin, as main carotenoid and flavonoid found) compared to D and W. Conclusively, illumination with B + R or B during shelf-life is recommended to enhance the main bioactive compounds. G + R and G + FR, also reported to be good elicitors of the phenolics and carotenoids biosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Illumination increased tomato weight loss.

Treatment
illuminatione0
Outcome
weight lossese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes under illumination showed higher weight losses and firmness decreases (30–35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Illumination decreased firmness by 30–35%.

Treatment
illuminatione0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
30–35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomatoes under illumination showed higher weight losses and firmness decreases (30–35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No chilling injury was observed.

Outcome
No chilling injurye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No chilling injury was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue plus red lighting increased carotenoid content by about 27%.

Treatment
B + R lightinge0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
∼27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B + R lighting increased the carotenoid content by ∼27%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G + R lighting increased phenolics by about 30%.

Treatment
G + Re0
Outcome
phenolicse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
∼30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G + R and G + FR reported an increase ∼30% in phenolics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G + FR lighting increased phenolics by about 30%.

Treatment
G + FRe0
Outcome
phenolicse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
∼30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G + R and G + FR reported an increase ∼30% in phenolics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B produced the highest increase in lycopene and naringenin biosynthesis compared with dark and white light.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
phytochemical biosynthesis (lycopene and naringenine0
Direction
highest increasee0
Comparator
D and We0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B and B + R showed the highest increase in the phytochemical biosynthesis (lycopene and naringenin, as main carotenoid and flavonoid found) compared to D and W”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B + R produced the highest increase in lycopene and naringenin biosynthesis compared with dark and white light.

Treatment
B + Re0
Outcome
phytochemical biosynthesis (lycopene and naringenine0
Direction
highest increasee0
Comparator
D and We0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B and B + R showed the highest increase in the phytochemical biosynthesis (lycopene and naringenin, as main carotenoid and flavonoid found) compared to D and W”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend B + R illumination to enhance tomato bioactive compounds.

Treatment
B + Re0
Outcome
enhance the main bioactive compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“illumination with B + R or B during shelf-life is recommended to enhance the main bioactive compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend B illumination to enhance tomato bioactive compounds.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
enhance the main bioactive compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“illumination with B + R or B during shelf-life is recommended to enhance the main bioactive compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G + R was reported as a good elicitor of phenolic and carotenoid biosynthesis.

Treatment
G + Re0
Outcome
phenolics and carotenoids biosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G + R and G + FR, also reported to be good elicitors of the phenolics and carotenoids biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G + FR was reported as a good elicitor of phenolic and carotenoid biosynthesis.

Treatment
G + FRe0
Outcome
phenolics and carotenoids biosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G + R and G + FR, also reported to be good elicitors of the phenolics and carotenoids biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of postharvest visible spectrum LED lighting on quality and bioactive compounds of tomatoes during shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

40 papers: 36 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.